✦ LIBER ✦

Stress impairs acquisition of delay eyeblink conditioning in men and women

✍ Scribed by Oliver T. Wolf; Denise Minnebusch; Irene Daum

Book ID: 116791753
Publisher: Elsevier Science
Year: 2009
Tongue: English
Weight: 270 KB
Volume: 91
Category: Article
ISSN: 1074-7427
DOI: 10.1016/j.nlm.2008.11.002

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Eyeblink conditional discrimination lear

Eyeblink conditional discrimination learning in healthy young men is impaired after stress exposure

✍ Oliver T. Wolf; Denise Soria Bauser; Irene Daum 📂 Article 📅 2011 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 283 KB

Amygdala plays important roles in acquis

Amygdala plays important roles in acquisition and retention of delay eyeblink conditioning in mice

✍ Sakamoto, Toshiro; Ogawa, Sonoko; Endo, Shogo 📂 Article 📅 2009 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 93 KB

Impaired delay and trace eyeblink condit

Impaired delay and trace eyeblink conditioning performance in major depressive disorder

✍ Tracy L. Greer; Madhukar H. Trivedi; Lucien T. Thompson 📂 Article 📅 2005 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 158 KB

Discriminative delay Pavlovian eyeblink

Discriminative delay Pavlovian eyeblink conditioning in veterans with and without posttraumatic stress disorder

✍ J.P. Ginsberg; Edwin Ayers; Louisa Burriss; D.A. Powell 📂 Article 📅 2008 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 458 KB

Impaired Delay Eyeblink Conditioning in

Impaired Delay Eyeblink Conditioning in Amnesic Korsakoff s Patients and Recovered Alcoholics

✍ Regina McGlinchey-Berroth; Laird S. Cermak; Maria C. Carrillo; Susan Armfield; J 📂 Article 📅 1995 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 695 KB

Ontogeny of delay versus trace eyeblink

Ontogeny of delay versus trace eyeblink conditioning in the rat

✍ Dragana Ivkovich; Christine M. Paczkowski; Mark E. Stanton 📂 Article 📅 2000 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 180 KB 👁 2 views

The ontogeny of delay versus trace eyeblink conditioning was examined in 19-, 23-, and 30-day-old rat pups. Pairings of a tone conditioned stimulus (CS) and periocular shock unconditioned stimulus (US; 100-ms) were presented in one of three conditioning paradigms: standard delay [380-ms CS, 280-ms i