𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Strategies for phase II cancer chemoprevention trials: Cervix, endometrium, and ovary

✍ Scribed by Dr. Gary J. Kelloff; Charles W. Boone; James A. Crowell; Susan G. Nayfield; Ernest Hawk; Vernon E. Steele; Ronald A. Lubet; Caroline C. Sigman


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
1995
Tongue
English
Weight
782 KB
Volume
59
Category
Article
ISSN
0730-2312

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Well-designed and conducted Phase 11 clinical trials are very important to cancer chemoprevention drug development. Three critical aspects govern the design and conduct of these trials-wellcharacterized agents, suitable cohorts, and reliable biomarkers for measuring efficacy that can serve as surrogate endpoints for cancer incidence.

Requirements for the agent are experimental or epidemiological data showing chemopreventive efficacy, safety on chronic administration, and a mechanistic rationale for the chemopreventive activity observed. Agents that meet these criteria for chemoprevention of cervical cancer include antiproliferative


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Subjects and recruitment strategies for
✍ Victor G. Vogel πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1993 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 177 KB

Progression of breast neoplasia is characterized by a variety of causal and nonspecific molecular, karyotypic, and cellular level genetic alterations. These include allelic losses, chromosomal rearrangements, and aneusomies, as well as widely divergent clonal DNA content aberrations. Establishment o

Strategies for the application of biomar
✍ Kapil Dhingra; Victor Vogel; Nour Sneige; Aysegul Sahin; Marcelo Aldaz; Gabriel πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1993 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 648 KB

Current chemoprevention trial designs based on epidemiological risk assessment and occurrence of cancer as an endpoint are inefficient and expensive. Novel biomarkers are needed to facilitate the development of chemopreventive interventions. The following four categories of biomarkers may be useful

Optimal three-stage designs for phase II
✍ T. Timothy Chen πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1997 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 136 KB πŸ‘ 2 views

The objective of a phase II cancer clinical trial is to screen a treatment that can produce a similar or better response rate compared to the current treatment results. This screening is usually carried out in two stages as proposed by Simon. For ineffective treatment, the trial should terminate at

Expanded phase II trial of gemcitabine a
✍ Rachel P. Riechelmann; Carol A. Townsley; Sheray N. Chin; Gregory R. Pond; Jenni πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2007 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 85 KB πŸ‘ 2 views

## Abstract ## BACKGROUND. A phase 2 trial of gemcitabine and capecitabine (GemCap) in patients with advanced biliary cancer led to an objective response in approximately 30% of patients and a median survival of 14 months. In the current study, the authors report further efficacy data of a larger

Phase II trial of irinotecan, cisplatin
✍ Dean A. Fennell; Jeremy P.C. Steele; Jonathan Shamash; Sarah E. Slater; Michael πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2007 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 French βš– 87 KB πŸ‘ 1 views

## Abstract There is no standard therapy for relapsed small cell lung cancer (rSCLC). We evaluated the efficacy and toxicity of a new triplet consisting of irinotecan (100 mg/m^2^ Days 1 and 15 q28), cisplatin (40 mg/m^2^ Days 1 and 15 q28) and mitomycin (6 mg/m^2^ d1 q28) administered to a maximum

Phase II trial of etoposide and cisplati
✍ Graziano, Stephen L. ;Lee, Kewchang ;Propert, Kathleen J. ;Tinsley, Roger ;Hayes πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1990 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 466 KB πŸ‘ 1 views

## Abstract A phase II trial of etoposide and cisplatin for patients with previously treated small cell lung cancer was carried out by CALGB from June 1983 to May 1984. Thirty‐five evaluable patients who had failed one prior chemotherapy regimen were treated with etoposide 80 mg/m^2^ and cisplatin