𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Strategies for comparing treatments on a binary response with multi-centre data

✍ Scribed by Alan Agresti; Jonathan Hartzel


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2000
Tongue
English
Weight
162 KB
Volume
19
Category
Article
ISSN
0277-6715

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


This paper surveys methods for comparing treatments on a binary response when observations occur for several strata. A common application is multi-centre clinical trials, in which the strata refer to a sample of centres or sites of some type. Questions of interest include how one should summarize the difference between the treatments, how one should make inferential comparisons, how one should investigate whether treatment-by-centre interaction exists, how one should describe effects when interaction exists, whether one should treat centres and centre-specific treatment effects as fixed or random, and whether centres that have either 0 successes or 0 failures should contribute to the analysis. This article discusses these matters in the context of various strategies for analysing such data, in particular focusing on special problems presented by sparse data.


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Step Down Procedure for Comparing Severa
✍ Tsunehisa Imada; Hideyuki Douke πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2007 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 121 KB πŸ‘ 2 views

## Abstract In this study we consider a multiple comparison of several treatments with a control based on multivariate normal response in clinical trials. Specifically we construct a step down procedure by referring to Dunnett and Tamhane (1991). Furthermore we formulate the all‐pairs power by usin