๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

Stomach cancer patterns in European immigrants to Connecticut, United States

โœ Scribed by David I. Gregorio; John T. Flannery; Holger Hansen


Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Year
1992
Tongue
English
Weight
563 KB
Volume
3
Category
Article
ISSN
0957-5243

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis


Age-adjusted annual incidence rates of stomach cancer (ICD-9 code #151) were examined for the period 1973 -88 among Connecticut residents who were born in the United States or who emigrated from one of five European nations (Italy, Poland, the United Kingdom, Germany, Portugal). Risk of stomach cancer among each of the five immigrant groups was elevated significantly above that of US-born residents. The magnitude of difference ranged from a 1.62-fold excess among persons born in Italy to a 4.27-fold increase in risk among persons born in Portugal. Cancer risk to foreign-born residents was less than that observed in their native countries, with decreases of 25-64 percent found here. Several differences in patient and disease characteristics were observed according to country of birth. Compared with US-born residents, there was a lesser predominance of males among patients born in Italy, Poland, and the UK. Among all foreign-born groups, the gastric cardia was involved less frequently, and the pyloric region more frequently, than in US-born patients. Adenocarcinomas were significantly less common among Polish-born cases. The findings suggest different etiologies in foreign and US-born patients.


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Reply to correspondence re: Le et al., C
โœ Gem M. Le; Scarlett L. Gomez; Christina A. Clarke; Sally L. Glaser; Dee W. West ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2003 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ French โš– 36 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 1 views

## Dear Sir, We appreciate the comments made by Ngoan et al. 1 in response to our article "Cancer incidence patterns among Vietnamese in the United States and Ha Noi, Vietnam" published in this journal. The authors raise the point that the age structures of the 2 populations under comparison are