𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Stock effects and seasonality in the fcoj futures basis

✍ Scribed by William M. Malick; Ronald W. Ward


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
1987
Tongue
English
Weight
600 KB
Volume
7
Category
Article
ISSN
0270-7314

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


asis theory and storage models deal with the importance of stocks as a deter-B minant of a futures basis where stocks are the connecting link between the present and future. For frozen concentrated orange juice (FCOJ) the effect of stocks on the basis varies with seasonal factors facing the industry. Storage theory sets the condition that the basis equals the marginal costs of carrying stocks through time. When stocks are relatively low, cash prices are pushed up relative to futures prices, thus encouraging stock holders to draw down existing inventories (Brennan, 1958;Weymar, 1966). Some stocks will remain in storage even with a large price inversion because of the convenience yield. That is, futures prices remain inverted (a negative basis) without all stocks being drawn out of storage.

In this article a futures basis model for frozen concentrated orange juice (FCOJ) is estimated that links basis performance to stocks and other industry variables. A constant period from maturity (CPM) model is used to measure seasonality in the FCOJ futures market. Such seasonality has direct implications for establishing trading plans and for understanding unique characteristics of this market.

THE FCOJ INDUSTRY

FCOJ stocks vary seasonally. In the latter months of the citrus harvest seasons, inventories are typically near their maximum levels (Figure 1) (Ward and Kilmer, 1980). To incorporate these stock levels into a basis analysis, they must be normalized in a way to account for seasonal accumulations and depletion of inventories. Normalized stocks are defined as current stocks weighted by the average seasonal stock levels for specific periods within the production year. Stocks may be above


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Commonality in trading activity and futu
✍ Hsiu-Chuan Lee; Cheng-Yi Chien; Tzu-Hsiang Liao πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2011 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 277 KB πŸ‘ 1 views

## Abstract This study examines commonality in trading activity by various types of institutional investors across futures and stock markets, and the dynamic relationship between the common factors in trading activity and the futures‐cash basis. The empirical results provide evidence of commonality

An investigation into seasonality in the
✍ Gerald D. Gay; Tae-Hyuk Kim πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1987 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 786 KB

for and identifies day-of-the-week and month-of-the-year effects market. The results are surprisingly similar to those found in -\_ studies of seasonality in stock returns, despite the existence of significant institutional differences between the two markets. Among the more notable findings are the

The β€œweekend effect” for stock indexes a
✍ Frederick J. Phillips-Patrick; Thomas Schneeweis πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1988 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 458 KB

Thomas Schneeweis\* ver the last ten years, several academic studies have identified a statistical-0 ly significant weekly pattern in stock returns.' Similar effects have been found in stock index futures.\* The results of these studies show that the average return of stock indexes and stock index f

Volume determination in stock and stock
✍ John J. Merrick Jr. πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1987 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 827 KB

he pricing of futures contracts relative to their underlying cash assets via no-T arbitrage relations has been a subject of extensive theoretical and empirical research. Recent studies of arbitrage-enforced relative futures-cash pricing restrictions by for Treasury bill futures,' and by ; Cornell a