✦ LIBER ✦

Stochastic dominance and Friedman-Savage utility functions

✍ Scribed by Dominique Thon; Lars Thorlund-Petersen

Book ID: 107908773
Publisher: Elsevier Science
Year: 1988
Tongue: English
Weight: 856 KB
Volume: 16
Category: Article
ISSN: 0165-4896
DOI: 10.1016/0165-4896(88)90044-3

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

WEALTH, RANK, RISK AVERSION AND THE FRIE

WEALTH, RANK, RISK AVERSION AND THE FRIEDMAN-SAVAGE UTILITY FUNCTION

✍ ELIAKIM KATZ 📂 Article 📅 1983 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 166 KB

On the utility premium of Friedman and S

On the utility premium of Friedman and Savage

✍ Louis Eeckhoudt; Harris Schlesinger 📂 Article 📅 2009 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 159 KB

Vertical product differentiation can imp

Vertical product differentiation can imply the Friedman-Savage utility function

✍ Gareth D. Myles 📂 Article 📅 1990 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 294 KB

Utility maximization, risk aversion, and

Utility maximization, risk aversion, and stochastic dominance

✍ Mathias Beiglböck, Johannes Muhle-Karbe, Johannes Temme 📂 Article 📅 2011 🏛 Springer-Verlag 🌐 English ⚖ 319 KB

Stochastic Dominance and Prospect Domina

Stochastic Dominance and Prospect Dominance with Subjective Weighting Functions

✍ Haim Levy; Zvi Wiener 📂 Article 📅 1998 🏛 Springer 🌐 English ⚖ 104 KB

Under stochastic dominance Choquet-expec

Under stochastic dominance Choquet-expected utility and anticipated utility are identical

✍ Peter Wakker 📂 Article 📅 1990 🏛 Springer US 🌐 English ⚖ 625 KB

The aim of this paper is to convince the reader that Choquet-expected utility, as initiated by Schmeidler (1982Schmeidler ( , 1989) ) for decision making under uncertainty, when formulated for decision making under risk naturally leads to anticipated utility, as initiated by Quiggin/Yaari. Thus the