𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Stimulation of bone formation by a swelling endosseous implant

✍ Scribed by Greenberg, A. R. ;Kamel, I. L. ;Dubin, S. ;Miller, A.


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
1978
Tongue
English
Weight
972 KB
Volume
12
Category
Article
ISSN
0021-9304

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Stimulation o f Bone Formation by a Swelling Endosseous Implant

As previously reported,'q2 a polymer-ceramic composite designed for endosseous implant applications has been developed. The composites were prepared by the free-radical polymerization of an acrylic acid solution and a difunctional acrylate in the presence of 0.3 pm akunina powder. Mechanical testing indicated that the material had a compressive yield strength of 89-102 MPa (13-15 ksi) and an elastic modulus of 2055-2740 MPa (300-400 ksi). The average porosity of the composite was determined to be in the range of 50-55 ~0 1 % .

A unique property of this material is its ability to gradually swell in aqueous media to a degree which can be precisely controlled via the extent of matrix cross-linking. The present material was designed to obtain an equilibrium swelling level of 15-25 vol % in Ringers solution a t 40OC. The advantages of such controlled swelling in an endosseous implant material are twofold. First, it allows for rapid adaptation of the prosthesis to the contour of the socket. Second, it induces a state of compressive stress around the implant site. It has been suggested that the presence of such a force field will result in the stimulation of bone f o r m a t i ~n . ~~ This paper reports the initial results obtained from a series of animal implantation experiments utilizing this swelling composite material.

EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURE

Six adult mongrel dogs were used in these experiments. Following standard aseptic procedures, four holes were made in each canine femoral shaft with a 3/16-in. (4.76 mm) Michelle 1aminect.omy trephine. Cylindrical implant specimens which had been machined to a diameter of 4.65-4.67 mm were placed in the right femur of each animal.

Approximately 4 weeks later, additional specimens were inserted into the animal's left


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Bone response to endosseous titanium imp
✍ Jin-Woo Park; Il-Sung Jang; Jo-Young Suh πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2008 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 441 KB

## Abstract This study evaluated the effects of the addition of oxide structure with submicron‐scale porous morphology on the periimplant bone response around titanium (Ti) implants with microroughened surfaces. Hydroxyapatite‐blasted Ti implants with (experimental) and without (control) a porous o

Fixation of porous titanium implants in
✍ Colella, S. M. ;Miller, A. G. ;Stang, R. G. ;Stoebe, T. G. ;Spengler, D. M. πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1981 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 578 KB

## Abstract The effect of __in vivo__ electrical stimulation on the interfacial strength between porous titanium implants and cortical bone was studied in mongrel dogs. The interfacial shear strength of the stimulated implants was consistently greater than that of controls. No difference could be o