๐”– Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

๐Ÿ“

Statutory Interpretation

โœ Scribed by Michelle Sanson


Publisher
OUP Australia & New Zealand
Year
2016
Tongue
English
Leaves
450
Edition
2
Category
Library

โฌ‡  Acquire This Volume

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis


Statutory Interpretation 2nd edition revitalises learning of statutory interpretation as a living, breathing and dynamic tool for understanding and applying the law. The book is specifically designed to engage students with statutory interpretation and equip them with improved skills required for future legal practice. It is structured to align with the length of a typical semester, and in addition to research and analysis of statutory interpretation rules and principles, Statutory Interpretation provides case scenarios and application exercises. Chapter 14: A Synthesis: Practical Skills and Exercises has been designed as a consolidating chapter to which readers will repeatedly refer and contains a Statutory Interpretation Index (SII2) synthesising the books rules of statutory interpretation, then embeds these in a set of four practical exercises.

โœฆ Table of Contents


1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Statutory Interpretation: Pragmatics and
โœ Douglas Walton, Fabrizio Macagno, Giovanni Sartor ๐Ÿ“‚ Library ๐Ÿ“… 2021 ๐Ÿ› Cambridge University Press ๐ŸŒ English

Statutory interpretation involves the reconstruction of the meaning of a legal statement when it cannot be considered as accepted or granted. This phenomenon needs to be considered not only from the legal and linguistic perspective, but also from the argumentative one - which focuses on the strategi

Statutory and Common Law Interpretation
โœ Kent Greenawalt ๐Ÿ“‚ Library ๐Ÿ“… 2012 ๐Ÿ› Oxford University Press ๐ŸŒ English

As Kent Greenwalt's second volume on aspects of legal interpretation, this book analyzes statutory and common law interpretation and compares the two. In respect to statutory interpretation, it first asks whether judges are "faithful agents" of the legislature or "independent cooperative partners."