Statistics as Principled Argument
✍ Scribed by Robert P. Abelson
- Publisher
- Psychology Press
- Year
- 1995
- Tongue
- English
- Leaves
- 238
- Category
- Library
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
In this illuminating volume, Robert P. Abelson delves into the too-often dismissed problems of interpreting quantitative data and then presenting them in the context of a coherent story about one's research. Unlike too many books on statistics, this is a remarkably engaging read, filled with fascinating real-life (and real-research) examples rather than with recipes for analysis. It will be of true interest and lasting value to beginning graduate students and seasoned researchers alike.
The focus of the book is that the purpose of statistics is to organize a useful argument from quantitative evidence, using a form of principled rhetoric. Five criteria, described by the acronym MAGIC (magnitude, articulation, generality, interestingness, and credibility) are proposed as crucial features of a persuasive, principled argument.
Particular statistical methods are discussed, with minimum use of formulas and heavy data sets. The ideas throughout the book revolve around elementary probability theory, t tests, and simple issues of research design. It is therefore assumed that the reader has already had some access to elementary statistics. Many examples are included to explain the connection of statistics to substantive claims about real phenomena.
✦ Subjects
Психологические дисциплины;Матметоды и моделирование в психологии;
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
Series forward -- Preface -- 1. Introduction and overview -- 2. Passive -- 3. Affectee arguments -- 4. Grammatical function changing morphology -- 5. Derived nominals -- 6. Conclusion -- Appendix A. A compositional semantics for argument heads -- Appendix B. First application of merge -- Notes -- Re
<p><p>This book presents reflections on the relationship between narratives and argumentative discourse. It focuses on their functional and structural similarities or dissimilarities, and offers diverse perspectives and conceptual tools for analyzing the narratives’ potential power for justification
This book is a facsimile reprint and may contain imperfections such as marks, notations, marginalia and flawed pages.