Statistical reviewing for medical journals
β Scribed by Douglas G. Altman
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 1998
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 100 KB
- Volume
- 17
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0277-6715
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
This paper reviews the difficulties associated with being a statistical reviewer for a medical journal. As background, I consider first the use of statistical reviewers by medical journals, medical journals' policies on statistical peer review, and the limited evidence of its effectiveness. The assessment of a manuscript is considered under the headings of design, methods of analysis, presentation and interpretation, with many illustrative examples of the difficulties to be overcome. I emphasize the judgemental nature of many aspects. I suggest how to present and structure the reviewer's report to the editor. Finally, I consider wider issues, including the various other ways in which statisticians can interact with medical journals.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
The editorial office of the American Journal of Physical Anthropology is pleased to announce that effective immediately, submissions of manuscripts can be completed electronically via the AJPA web submission site. This new web-based system of review will allow authors to submit manuscripts by upload
This comprehensive yet concise book provides a thorough and complete guide to every aspect of managing the peer review process for scientific journals. Until now, little information has been readily available on how this important facet of the journal publishing process should be conducted properly.
## Abstract ## Objective With the growth in patient registries in rheumatic disease research, it is important to validate the collected information. We examined the convergent validity of selfβreported medication use for rheumatoid arthritis (RA). ## Methods In the setting of the Brigham Rheumat