𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Statistical framework and noise sensitivity of the amplitude radial correlation contrast method

✍ Scribed by Zeev Gideon Kipervaser; Galit Pelled; Gadi Goelman


Book ID
102532906
Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2007
Tongue
English
Weight
336 KB
Volume
58
Category
Article
ISSN
0740-3194

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Abstract

A statistical framework for the amplitude radial correlation contrast (RCC) method, which integrates a conventional pixel threshold approach with cluster‐size statistics, is presented. The RCC method uses functional MRI (fMRI) data to group neighboring voxels in terms of their degree of temporal cross correlation and compares coherences in different brain states (e.g., stimulation OFF vs. ON). By defining the RCC correlation map as the difference between two RCC images, the map distribution of two OFF states is shown to be normal, enabling the definition of the pixel cutoff. The empirical cluster‐size null distribution obtained after the application of the pixel cutoff is used to define a cluster‐size cutoff that allows 5% false positives. Assuming that the fMRI signal equals the task‐induced response plus noise, an analytical expression of amplitude‐RCC dependency on noise is obtained and used to define the pixel threshold. In vivo and ex vivo data obtained during rat forepaw electric stimulation are used to fine‐tune this threshold. Calculating the spatial coherences within in vivo and ex vivo images shows enhanced coherence in the in vivo data, but no dependency on the anesthesia method, magnetic field strength, or depth of anesthesia, strengthening the generality of the proposed cutoffs. Magn Reson Med 58:554–561, 2007. © 2007 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.


📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES