𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Statistical distribution of daily rainfall and its association with the coefficient of variation of rainfall series

✍ Scribed by R. Ananthakrishnan; M. K. Soman


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
1989
Tongue
English
Weight
968 KB
Volume
9
Category
Article
ISSN
0899-8418

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


The paper deals with the statistical analysis of the daily rainfall series (monthly, seasonal, and annual) of 15 Indian stations representing a wide variety of rainfall regimes, utilizing the data for the period 1901-1980. The study focuses attention on the normalized rainfall curve (NRC) depicting the association between cumulated percentage rain amount (x) and cumulated percentage number of rain days (y) of the rainfall series. It is shown that the NRC is uniquely determined by the coefficient of variation (CV) of the rainfall series. There is no universal NRC that can represent all rainfall regimes.

The

where b and c are two empirical constants, gives a good analytical representation of the NRCs over a wide range of CV values of the rainfall series. This analytical equation is able to account for the occurrence of high rainfall intensities towards the upper extremity of the NRC for rainfall series with high values of CV. The rain intensity corresponding to any point on the NRC is inversely proportional to the slope of the tangent at that point. The point where the slope is 45" corresponds to the mean rain amount per rain day (r) of the rainfall series. It is shown that days with rain amount greater than r (considered as days of significant rainfall) constitute about 30 per cent of the rain days and contribute 75-80 per cent of the total rain amount, with some local and seasonal variations. K ~Y WORDS Daily rainfall series Coefficient of variation Normalized rainfall curve Analytical representation Significant rainfall * n = mean number of rain days; r =mean rain amount per rain day in mm; u= standard deviation in mm; CV =coefficient of variation in per cent.


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


The distribution of rainfall intensity i
✍ Sharon, D. ;Kutiel, H. πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1986 πŸ› Wiley (John Wiley & Sons)

A large body of data has been used to study the distribution of instantaneous rainfall intensity in Israel and its variations in space and in time. Time resolution is k3 minutes. Besides the direct uses that the numerical results may have for practical purposes, the results have been used here to ch

Rainfall frequency analysis using a mixe
✍ Chulsang Yoo; Kwang-Sik Jung; Tae-Woong Kim πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2005 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 184 KB πŸ‘ 1 views

## Abstract The effect of global warming (represented by general circulation model monthly rainfall predictions) on the daily rainfall distribution is investigated using a mixed Gamma distribution to estimate the change of rainfall quantiles. A mixed distribution is used to overcome the limitation

some aspects of daily rainfall distribut
✍ M. K. Soman; K. Krishna Kumar πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1990 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 700 KB

## Abstract This paper presents the results of an analysis of the daily rainfall at 365 Indian stations for the 80‐year period, 1901–1980. The rainfall data relate to the south‐west monsoon season June to September (122 days), which accounts for the major part of the annual rainfall over most parts

Recurrent daily rainfall patterns over S
✍ Julien CrΓ©tat; Yves Richard; Benjamin Pohl; Mathieu Rouault; Chris Reason; Nicol πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2010 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 789 KB

## Abstract This paper investigates the influence of some modes of climate variability on the spatio‐temporal rainfall variability over South Africa during the core of the rainy season, December to February (DJF). All analyses are based directly on the rainfall field instead of atmospheric processe

Inter-decadal variability of Tibetan spr
✍ Yuanxiang Wang; Ping Zhao; Rucong Yu; Ghulam Rasul πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2009 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 593 KB

## Abstract Using the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index of NOAA/AVHRR, the European Centre for Medium‐Range Weather Forecast reanalysis and the Climate Prediction Center Merged Analysis of Precipitation data for the period 1982–1999, the relationship between the inter‐decadal variability of sp