๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

Standards in Forensic Practice

โœ Scribed by Allan Jamieson; Alan Kershaw


Publisher
Elsevier Science
Year
2000
Tongue
English
Weight
375 KB
Volume
40
Category
Article
ISSN
1355-0306

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis


Standards in Forensic Practice

first and second paragraphs of 'Accreditation of laborato-Sir: It is unfortunate that I find my opinions attacked ries' -and those are just the guides! (Correspondence, from Dr Bramley, Science & Justice 1999; 39(4): 274-276) as 'ill-informed' and in a more directly personal manner than is warranted in a professional scientific journal. I am therefore forced to defend my professional credibility in addition to my argument.

Coming from a rather broader scientific and managerial background than most, with experience in the biomedical sciences and other professions allied to medicine, I have had the opportunity to experience first-hand, as scientist and manager, the attempts and dangers of those seeking to establish themselves as 'professional'. Although not acknowledged in Dr Bramley's letter, I am a member of the National Training Organisation Sector Committee which Dr Bramley chairs; I represent the Lothian and Borders Police Forensic Science Laboratory and the Institute of Biology on the Professional Register Consultative Forum; and I support and actively promote scientific training, as head of the laboratory, in many documented ways within and outwith my laboratory.

Being, like Drs Thompson and Bramley, not a practising forensic


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


General Practice in Forensic Science
โœ H.A. ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1981 ๐Ÿ› Elsevier ๐ŸŒ English โš– 99 KB

Is it reasonable to expect that a forensic scientist can develop or possess true scientijc expertise in several diverse areas such as drug chemistry, arsons and ex@losives, serology, toxicology and trace evidence anaiysi~, as well as being engaged in the training of new personnel, in addition to hav

Professional convergence in forensic pra
โœ Dave Mercer; Tom Mason; Joel Richman ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2001 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 98 KB

## ABSTRACT __This paper outlines the development and convergence of forensic science and secure psychiatric services in the UK, locating the professionalization of forensic nursing within a complex web of political, economic, and ideological structures. It is suggested that a stagnation of the th

Forensic science standards in fast-chang
โœ Peter Sommer ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2010 ๐Ÿ› Elsevier Science ๐ŸŒ English โš– 171 KB

The Law Commission considered four possible options: exclusionary discretion without guidance, exclusionary discretion with guidance, an admissibility test requiring consensus amongst experts in the field; an admissibility rule requiring the trial judge to assess the evidentiary reliability of tende

Minimum standards for urodynamic practic
โœ Gurpreet Singh; Malcolm Lucas; Lucia Dolan; Stephanie Knight; Carmel Ramage; Phi ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2010 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 104 KB

## Abstract ## Aim This paper reports on the recent publication and wide distribution of a joint statement on minimum standards for urodynamic practice in the UK. ## Methods A multidisciplinary working party were tasked with creating standards for both training and certification in urodynamics,