𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Standardized assessment of whole body adipose tissue topography by MRI

✍ Scribed by Jürgen Machann; Claus Thamer; Birgit Schnoedt; Michael Haap; Hans-Ulrich Haring; Claus D. Claussen; Michael Stumvoll; Andreas Fritsche; Fritz Schick


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2005
Tongue
English
Weight
781 KB
Volume
21
Category
Article
ISSN
1053-1807

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Abstract

Purpose

To assess standardized whole body adipose tissue topography in a cohort of subjects at an increased risk for type 2 diabetes and to compare fat distribution in subgroups regarding anthropometric (age, body mass index [BMI]) and metabolic parameters (insulin sensitivity).

Materials and Methods

A total of 80 volunteers (40 females, 40 males) underwent T1‐weighted MR imaging of the entire body. Standardized adipose tissue (AT) profiles were calculated considering the different body structure of the participants. The measured data were interpolated to a defined number of sampling points enabling a direct comparison of the profiles independent on body structure. Resulting mean profiles and region‐dependent standard deviations of four age groups and three BMI‐groups were compared for females and males. Correlations between insulin sensitivity and body fat distribution were analyzed.

Results

Reliable adipose tissue profiles could be obtained from all volunteers. In BMI‐matched subgroups, females show significant higher AT and subcutaneous abdominal AT (P < 0.05 both), but lower visceral AT (P < 0.01) compared to the males. Furthermore, visceral AT increases with age, as shown in the matched age groups. In both gender groups, insulin‐resistant subjects are characterized by higher visceral adipose tissue (VAT) compared to insulin‐sensitive subjects. In addition, profiles of insulin‐resistant subjects show more AT in the shoulder/neck region but less AT in the upper extremities.

Conclusion

Standardized assessment of whole body AT profiles based on T1‐weighted MRI provides a reliable basis for interindividual comparison of the body fat distribution and allows a fast and reliable quantification of total body adipose tissue and the distribution of different AT components as subcutaneous and visceral fat in different body regions. Differences in standardized profiles might enable an early identification of people at risk of metabolic disorders, as not only the amount but also the distribution of AT is expected to play an essential role in the pathogenesis of metabolic diseases. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2005;21:455–462. © 2005 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.


📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES


Topography mapping of whole body adipose
✍ Christian Würslin; Jürgen Machann; Hansjörg Rempp; Claus Claussen; Bin Yang; Fri 📂 Article 📅 2010 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 348 KB

## Abstract ## Purpose: To obtain quantitative measures of human body fat compartments from whole body MR datasets for the risk estimation in subjects prone to metabolic diseases without the need of any user interaction or expert knowledge. ## Materials and Methods: Sets of axial T1‐weighted spi

Automated assessment of whole-body adipo
✍ Joel Kullberg; Lars Johansson; Håkan Ahlström; Frederic Courivaud; Peter Koken; 📂 Article 📅 2009 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 684 KB

## Abstract ## Purpose To present an automated algorithm for segmentation of visceral, subcutaneous, and total volumes of adipose tissue depots (VAT, SAT, TAT) from whole‐body MRI data sets and to investigate the VAT segmentation accuracy and the reproducibility of all depot assessments. ## Mater

Measurement of subcutaneous adipose tiss
✍ Reinhard Möller; Erwin Tafeit; Thomas R. Pieber; Karl Sudi; Gilbert Reibnegger 📂 Article 📅 2000 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 296 KB 👁 2 views

The quantification of obesity in respect to subcutaneous adipose tissue and fat distribution is a matter of interest. We recently reported on a new optical device, LIPOMETER, and its ability to measure the thickness of subcutaneous adipose tissue and its advantages compared with other methods. To de