✦ LIBER ✦

Staging systems for multiple myeloma: a comparison

✍ Scribed by W. Gassmann; H. Pralle; T. Haferlach; S. Pandurevic; M. Graubner; N. Schmitz; H. Löffler

Book ID: 114710556
Publisher: John Wiley and Sons
Year: 1985
Tongue: English
Weight: 470 KB
Volume: 59
Category: Article
ISSN: 0007-1048
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.1985.tb07366.x

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

International Staging System for Multipl

International Staging System for Multiple Myeloma

✍ Greipp, P. R. 📂 Article 📅 2005 🏛 American Society of Clinical Oncology 🌐 English ⚖ 681 KB

Multiple myeloma: New staging systems fo

Multiple myeloma: New staging systems for diagnosis, prognosis and response evaluation

✍ S. Vincent Rajkumar; Francis Buadi 📂 Article 📅 2007 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 184 KB

A staging system for multiple myeloma ba

A staging system for multiple myeloma based on the morphology of myeloma cells

✍ Hirokazu Murakami; Tomoyuki Kawada; Takayuki Saitoh; Hideki Uchiumi; Kazuaki Mor 📂 Article 📅 2009 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 439 KB

Is the international staging system supe

Is the international staging system superior to the Durie–Salmon staging system? A comparison in multiple myeloma patients undergoing autologous transplant

✍ Hari, P N; Zhang, M-J; Roy, V; Pérez, W S; Bashey, A; To, L B; Elfenbein, G; Fre 📂 Article 📅 2009 🏛 Nature Publishing Group 🌐 English ⚖ 194 KB

Staging Systems and Prognostic Factors a

Staging Systems and Prognostic Factors as a Guide to Therapeutic Decisions in Multiple Myeloma

✍ Marie-Christine Kyrtsonis; Dimitrios Maltezas; Tatiana Tzenou; Efstathios Koulie 📂 Article 📅 2009 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 477 KB

A comparison of staging systems for naso

A comparison of staging systems for nasopharyngeal carcinoma

✍ Jay S. Cooper; Richard Cohen; Randy E. Stevens 📂 Article 📅 1998 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 110 KB 👁 2 views

## BACKGROUND. The fifth edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging manual defines new rules for classifying nasopharyngeal carcinoma. The authors tested the value of this new system by applying these rules retrospectively to their previously treated patients and comparing the resul