Let A be a meromorphic function with values in the space of bounded linear operators between two Banach spaces X and Y, and assume that the coefficients of the prinoipal part of the Laurent expansion of A at a certain point & are degenerate operators. In this paper it is shown that under rather gene
Stability properties of finite meromorphic operator functions. III
β Scribed by H Bart; M.A Kaashoek; D.C Lay
- Publisher
- Elsevier Science
- Year
- 1974
- Weight
- 834 KB
- Volume
- 77
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 1385-7258
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
The conjugate operator function
In this section we study some important relations between the H, and K,,, spaces for A and those for the conjugate operator function A*. We denote the conjugate spaces of X and Y by X* and Y*, respectively, and we define A* to be the function with values in 9'( Y*, X*) given by A*(l) = A@)*, for 3, in the domain of A. Clearly A* E &?(k, 9( Y*, X*)) and v(A*; 39) = =v(A; ;b). If A, denotes the 72th coefficient of the Laurent expansion of A at &, then (An)* is the corresponding coefficient of the Laurent expansion of A* at &. 6.1 REMARK.
Suppose that A is finite meromorphic at 39. Then it follows that A* is also finite meromorphic at ho. In Section 3 we have constructed in a canonical way operator functions S and T which are holomorphic at 20 and resemble in certain aspects the function A. It is not dificult to show that S* (resp., T*) bears the same relationship to A* that T (reap., 8) bears to A. Indeed, let B and 6' be operator functions given by (3-3) and (3-4). Then and '*(I) = A*(A) B*(1), ;z E A, Ao* Qo*, A=&. Observe that &I* is a continuous projection of Y* and dim R(&*) ~00. Furthermore, &o* =IY* -&I* and, from (32), A+_,Qo*=O, i=l, . . . . p. If one compares these results with formulas (3-ll), (3-12) and (3-13), one sees that S* has the desired properties. Similar formulas hold for T*.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Reduction to the holomorphic case We begin with two lemmas which will be useful both here and in other sections. The proof of Lemma 3.1(b) follows immediately from Theorem IV.1.12 in [l l] ; the proof of the other statements are elementary and will be omitted. We say that a subspace M of a Banach