๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

Spontaneous abortion and subsequent Down syndrome livebirth

โœ Scribed by E. B. Hook; P. K. Cross


Publisher
Springer
Year
1983
Tongue
English
Weight
324 KB
Volume
64
Category
Article
ISSN
0340-6717

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis


Analyses of two data sets are presented, one based on nationwide hospital discharges for the USA for 1970-1971, the other for Upstate New York vital record data for 1976-1981. Summary relative risks of a Down syndrome livebirth were calculated within the three maternal age categories below 20, 20-29, and 30 years and above for those with a history of one spontaneous abortion and for those with a history of two or more, compared to those with no reported previous abortions. There was significant heterogeneity by age and reproductive history in the relative risk of an affected child. In general the trends revealed that the younger the mother and the more the number of abortions, the higher the relative risk of a Down syndrome livebirth compared to the rates for women of the same age for those with no previous abortions. Extrapolation from average maternal age specific rates on Down syndrome imply a rate per 1000 livebirths somewhere in the range of 1.1 to 11.4 for women under 20 years with a history of one spontaneous abortion, of 5.2 to 13.4 for women under 20 years with a history of two or more spontaneous abortions, and of 1.0 to 2.4 for women 20 to 29 years with a history of two or more spontaneous abortions. (Average "background" livebirth rates in women under 30 years are, in contrast, in the range of about 0.5 to 1.0 per 1000 and for the average woman aged 35 years, at which prenatal diagnosis is usually felt to be indicated, 2.7 per 1000.) For those in the other categories these data did not reveal clinically significant effects upon average maternal age specific rates. It is emphasized that because of limitations in the data it is not possible to refine these risks by adjusting for karyotype, the age at which the abortions occurred, or other biologic and social factors associated with embryonic and fetal death. The implications of the analyses here for genetic counseling should be regarded as preliminary and tentative.


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Estimating the spontaneous loss of Down
โœ Isabelle C. Bray; David E. Wright ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1998 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 183 KB

Recent publications concerning the prevalence of Down syndrome at times of chorionic villus sampling (CVS), amniocentesis and livebirth were reviewed with particular interest in estimates of spontaneous loss of Down syndrome fetuses during pregnancy. Data from several studies were combined to provid

Acceptance of screening and abortion for
โœ Piia Jallinoja; Pรคivi Santalahti; Hanna Toiviainen; Elina Hemminki ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1999 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 97 KB

In this study we evaluated how well maternal serum screening and abortions for Down syndrome were accepted among midwives and public health nurses, and compared how those who accepted and did not accept abortions for Down syndrome differed from each other. The questionnaire was mailed in 1998 to 400

Impact of prenatal diagnosis on revised
โœ Carl A. Huether; Kristin Haroldson; Patricia M. Ellis; Colin N. Ramsay ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1996 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 554 KB

Ramsay et al. [(1991) Biomed Pharmacother 45:267-272] reported on the livebirth prevalence of Down syndrome in the Lothian region of Scotland during 1978-1989. Their results suggested a temporal association between the events of Chernobyl in April 1986 and a significant-excess of cases in 1987. In t