𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Split-face comparison of intense pulsed light with short- and long-pulsed dye lasers for the treatment of port-wine stains

✍ Scribed by Philipp Babilas; Stephan Schreml; Tatiana Eames; Ulrich Hohenleutner; Rolf-Markus Szeimies; Michael Landthaler


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2010
Tongue
English
Weight
167 KB
Volume
42
Category
Article
ISSN
0196-8092

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Abstract

Background

So far, pulsed dye lasers have been regarded as the gold standard in the treatment of port‐wine stains (PWS). Recently, intense pulsed light (IPL) has been reported to achieve more pronounced fading in some patients.

Objectives

To evaluate the efficacy and the side effects of IPL treatment of PWS in a direct comparison to the short‐pulsed dye laser (SPDL) and the long‐pulsed dye laser (LPDL).

Methods

Test spots (n = 158) were applied with IPL (λ~em~ = 555–950 nm, pulse duration: 8–14 milliseconds (single pulse), fluence: 11–17.3 J/cm^2^), the SPDL (λ~em~ = 585 nm, pulse duration: 0.45 milliseconds, fluence: 6 J/cm^2^), and the LPDL (λ~em~ = 585/590/595/600 nm, pulse duration: 1.5 milliseconds, fluence: 12/14/16/18 J/cm^2^) in a side‐by‐side modus in untreated (n = 11) and previously treated (n = 14) patients with PWS. Lesion clearance was evaluated by three blinded investigators based on follow‐up photographs 6 weeks after treatment. Incidence of side effects was assessed.

Results

In previously untreated PWS as well as in pretreated PWS, IPL treatments were rated significantly (P<0.05) better than treatments with the SPDL. In both groups, IPL and LPDL treatments did not differ significantly. Side effects were few in all settings.

Conclusions

In PWS resistant to dye laser therapy, IPL showed additional lesion clearance. The use of IPL increases the therapeutic possibilities in PWS. Lasers Surg. Med. 42:720–727, 2010 © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.


📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES


Treatment of resistant port wine stains
✍ Simone Laube; Saleem Taibjee; Sean W. Lanigan 📂 Article 📅 2003 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 254 KB 👁 1 views

## Abstract ## Background and Objectives Pulsed dye lasers (PDL; 585 nm, 0.45 millisecond) are the treatment of choice for port wine stains (PWS). However, clearance rates vary widely and are in many patients incomplete. The objective of this prospective pilot study was to investigate the effects

Treatment of port wine stains with photo
✍ Alun V. Evans; Alistair Robson; Richard J. Barlow; Habib A. Kurwa 📂 Article 📅 2005 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 62 KB 👁 1 views

## Background and objectives: Laser-induced photo thermal damage has been combined with photodynamic therapy (pdt) using a systemic photosensitiser to treat vascular lesions. the efficacy of pdt using systemic 5-aminolaevulinic acid (5-ala) as the photosensitiser and pulsed dye laser (pdl) as the l

A randomised, split-face comparison of f
✍ D.J. McGill; C. Hutchison; E. McKenzie; E. McSherry; I.R. Mackay 📂 Article 📅 2007 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 117 KB 👁 1 views

## Abstract ## Introduction Despite the high incidence of polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) in women attending for facial hair removal there are few studies looking specifically at this patient group. We carried out a split‐face study directly comparing the efficacy of a 3 milliseconds pulse durati

Comparing the effectiveness of 585-nm vs
✍ Cheng-Jen Chang; Kristen M. Kelly; Martin J.C. van Gemert; J. Stuart Nelson 📂 Article 📅 2002 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 234 KB

## Abstract ## Background and Objectives The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of cryogen spray cooled laser treatment (CSC‐LT) at wavelengths of 585 nm vs. 595 nm for port wine stain (PWS) birthmarks in a large series of patients. ## Study Design/Materials and Method

Prospective study of port wine stain tre
✍ Baerbel Greve; Christian Raulin 📂 Article 📅 2004 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 208 KB 👁 1 views

## Abstract ## Background and Objectives The conventional pulsed‐dye laser (wavelength 585 nm, pulse duration 0.5 milliseconds) is seen as the standard treatment for port wine stains (PWS). Using the pulsed‐dye laser at wavelengths of 590, 595, and 600 nm and at varying pulse durations of 1.5–40 m