𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Spinor representations on a sphere

✍ Scribed by S.S. Sannikov


Publisher
Elsevier Science
Year
1966
Weight
112 KB
Volume
87
Category
Article
ISSN
0029-5582

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


On Integral Representations and Boundary
✍ V. V. Kravchenko; E. RamΓ­rez de Arellano; M. V. Shapiro πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1996 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 551 KB

## Sprbljig A new approach to the boundary value problem for the classic Dirac equation is proposed. This approach is based on a recent version of the metaharmonic quaternionic analysis developed in [14-161. In particular, the following problem is studied: when and how a given function on a surfac

On the spinor representation of surfaces
✍ Thomas Friedrich πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1998 πŸ› Elsevier Science 🌐 English βš– 817 KB

The aim of the present paper is to clarify the relationship between immersions of surfaces and solutions of the Dirac equation. The main idea leading to the description of a surface M2 by a spinor field is the observation that the restriction to M2 of any parallel spinor $ on Iw3 is a non-trivial sp

Spinors over a Cone, Dirac Operator, and
✍ W. Biedrzycki πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1993 πŸ› Elsevier Science 🌐 English βš– 872 KB

The representations of \(\operatorname{Spin}(4,2)\), seem to be of particular physical interest since its quotient \(S O(4,2)\), is the conformal group of the spacetime. Kostant [7] has considered the Laplacian on a projective cone in \(R^{8}\) and has shown that the kernel \(H\) of the Laplacian is

A Purely Geometrical Introduction of Spi
✍ Dr. D. W. Ebner πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1973 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 209 KB

## Abstract Spinors are introduced using geometrical concepts only, such that no knowledge in representation theory is presupposed. The essential part is the purely geometrical proof of the conformity of the mapping of the celestial sphere onto itself induced by spinors.