Spin density description of rotational-echo double-resonance, transferred-echo double-resonance and two-dimensional transferred-echo double-resonance solid state nuclear magnetic resonance
β Scribed by Ernst R.H. van Eck; Wiebren S. Veeman
- Publisher
- Elsevier Science
- Year
- 1993
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 683 KB
- Volume
- 2
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0926-2040
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
The spin density matrix formalism has been applied to rotational-echo double-resonance (REDOR), transferred-echo double-resonance (TEDOR) and two-dimensional (2D) TEDOR experiments in order to obtain an expression for the signal intensities. TEDOR spectra of lSN-labeled glycine were measured with different dipolar evolution times. ZD-TEDOR spectra were measured of doubly labeled glycine-2-13C,15N and of r5N-labeled glycine. Both the TEDOR and the 2D-TEDOR spectra were readily obtained although the 2D-TEDOR experiment on r5N-labeled glycine used a lot of machine time. Even though the "N-l-r3C dipolar coupling is relatively small (200 Hz), the 1-C resonance can still be observed.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
A solid-state nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) technique is described for obtaining constraints on the backbone conformation of a protein or peptide that is prepared with uniform 15 N, 13 C labeling of consecutive pairs of amino acids or of longer segments. The technique, called double single-quantu
## Abstract Insect exoskeleton, multiply labeled with ^13^C and ^15^N, was examined by rotationalβecho doubleβresonance (REDOR) and doubleβcrossβpolarization (DCP) magicβangle spinning ^13^C NMR. Low levels of incorporation of label make the analysis of these samples a practical test of the relativ
A new solid-state MAS NMR experiment is described that recovers the dipolar interaction between spin-l/2 nuclei and quadrupolar nuclei spin pairs. This technique combines the principles of rotational-echo, double-resonance (REDOR) NMR and transfer-of-populations-double-resonance (TRAPDOR) NMR. Dipol
## Abstract The original article to which this Erratum refers was published in Magnetic Resonance in Medicine (2005) 54(1) 241β245.