𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Specificity of auto-tumor cytotoxicity exerted by fresh, activated and propagated human t lymphocytes

✍ Scribed by Farkas Vánky; Eva Klein


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
1982
Tongue
French
Weight
723 KB
Volume
29
Category
Article
ISSN
0020-7136

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Abstract

The specificity of auto‐tumor cytotoxicity exerted by patients' T lymphocytes was investigated. Lymphocytes, both activated and non‐activated, were used as effectors against freshly separated tumor cells. Activation was achieved by treatment with interferon (Hu‐IFN‐α), stimulation with PHA, co‐cultivation with autologous tumor biopsy cells (ATS) and allogeneic lymphocytes (MLC). Of these activation systems, ATS was the most efficient in generating auto‐tumor cytotoxicity. In some cases the lymphocytes activated in MLC or treated with PHA also damaged autologous tumor cells, but IFN‐pretreatment of the lymphocytes had no such effect. When the ATS‐ or MLC‐activated lymphocytes were propagated with conditioned medium known to contain Interleukin‐2, their lytic potential against autologous tumors was maintained. In addition to autologous tumor biopsy cells, the effector populations were also confronted with other targets such as Con A blasts and allogeneic tumor biopsy cells. The latter were lysed by the lymphocytes activated in MLC, but not by the ATS cultures. Thus, on the population level, the ATS was specific for the autologous tumor cells. Cold target competition tests suggested that in the MLC‐s the autologous tumor cells were killed by a distinct set of lymphocytes because allogeneic cells (tumor cells or the stimulator lymphocytes), even if killed by the same effector populations, did not compete. Thus, in these cultures the auto‐tumor specificity of the lysis was on the level of the effector subset. Therefore, it is likely that, independently of the mode of activation, the auto‐tumor lysis is the function of lymphocytes which recognize tumor‐ or organ‐specific antigens on the target cells.


📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES


Specificity of cell-mediated cytotoxicit
✍ Dr. P. Hersey; A. Edwards; J. Edwards; E. Adams; G. W. Milton; D. S. Nelson 📂 Article 📅 1975 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 French ⚖ 729 KB

## Abstract The specificity of cell‐mediated cytotoxicity against melanoma cells in vitro has been analyzed in a large number of studies with cells both from normal and melanoma subjects. As in a number of other, recent, similar human studies, no evidence for tumour specificity was found. Effector

Cross-reactive recognition of human and
✍ Rebecca Elkington; Naglaa H. Shoukry; Susan Walker; Tania Crough; Chrysa Fazou; 📂 Article 📅 2004 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 437 KB

## Abstract Although the importance of CD4^+^ T cell responses to human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) has recently been recognized in transplant and immunosuppressed patients, the precise specificity and nature of this response has remained largely unresolved. In the present study we have isolated CD4^+^

Regulation of human B cell activation an
✍ François Boué; Cécile Goujard; Jean-françois Delfraissy; Pierre Galanaud; Thierr 📂 Article 📅 1989 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 719 KB

## Regulation of human B cell activation and antibody production by non-major histocompatibility complexrestricted cytotoxic T lymphocytes To determine whether non-major histocompatibility complex-restricted cytotoxic human T lymphocytes (NrCTL) are involved in the regulation of antibody response,