To investigate the meaning of the mutations in the enhancer 2/core promoter (Enh2/CP) region of hepatitis B virus (HBV) during the chronic HBV infection, mutations were examined in the Enh2/ CP region (carboxyl half of X region) and their correlation with mutations in the precore and core regions in
Specific mutations in the enhancer II/core promoter/precore regions of hepatitis B virus subgenotype C2 in Korean patients with hepatocellular carcinoma
✍ Scribed by Ja Kyung Kim; Hye Young Chang; Jung Min Lee; Oidov Baatarkhuu; Young Joon Yoon; Jun Yong Park; Do Young Kim; Kwang-Hyub Han; Chae Yoon Chon; Sang Hoon Ahn
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2009
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 89 KB
- Volume
- 81
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0146-6615
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
Abstract
Recently, hepatitis B virus (HBV) genotypes and mutations have been reported to be related to hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This cross‐sectional case–control study examined the relationship between HCC and mutations in the enhancer II/core promoter and precore regions of HBV by comparing 135 Korean HCC patients infected with HBV genotype C2 (HBV/C2; HCC group) with 135 age‐, sex‐, and hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) status‐matched patients without HCC (non‐ HCC group). Age and sex were also matched between HBeAg‐positive and ‐negative patients. The prevalence of T1653, A1689, V1753, T1762/A1764, T1846, A1850, C1858, and A1896 mutations was evaluated in this population. The prevalence of the T1653 mutation in the box α region, the A1689 mutation in between the box α and β regions, and the T1762/A1764 mutations in the basal core promoter region was significantly higher in the HCC group compared to the non‐HCC group (8.9% vs. 2.2%, P = 0.017; 19.3% vs. 4.4%, P < 0.001; and 60.7% vs. 22.2%; P < 0.001). Among HBeAg‐negative patients, the frequency of the T1653 mutation was higher in the HCC group. Regardless of HBeAg status, the prevalence of the A1689, and T1762/A1764 mutations was higher in the HCC group than in the non‐HCC group. However, no association was observed between mutations in the precore region and HCC. Upon multivariate analysis, the presence of the T1653, A1689, and T1762/A1764 mutations was an independent predictive factor for HCC. The addition of the T1653 or A1689 mutation to T1762/A1764 increased the risk of HCC. In conclusion, the T1653, A1689, and/or T1762/A1764 mutations were associated with the development of HCC in Korean patients infected with HBV/C2. J. Med. Virol. 81:1002–1008, 2009. © 2009 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Abstract Studies on the characteristics of mutations within the hepatitis B virus (HBV) genome, their roles in the pathogenesis of advanced liver diseases, and the involvement of host properties of HBV‐infected individuals have not been conducted in subgenotype B3‐infected populations. For addre
## Abstract This study aimed to determine hepatitis B virus (HBV) mutations associated independently with the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), as adjusted with other mutations in the preS and core promoter regions of HBV genotypes B and C. One hundred and forty HBV‐infected patients with HCC
## Abstract Previous studies identified amino acid (aa) substitutions of the hepatitis C virus core region of genotype 1b (HCV‐1b core region) and elevated serum alpha‐fetoprotein (AFP) levels as predictors of poor virologic response to pegylated interferon (PEG‐IFN) plus ribavirin (RBV), and also
## Abstract The interferon sensitivity‐determining region (ISDR) is useful as a predictive marker of the response to interferon (IFN) therapy for chronic hepatitis patients with a Japan‐specific subtype (J‐type) of hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1b. This marker is not useful for predicting respon