✦ LIBER ✦

Species Differences in Spatial Memory Performance on a Three-dimensional Task

✍ Scribed by Russell P. Balda; Alan C. Kamil; Peter A. Bednekoff; Arla G. Hile

Book ID: 108893511
Publisher: John Wiley and Sons
Year: 2010
Tongue: English
Weight: 542 KB
Volume: 103
Category: Article
ISSN: 1439-0310
DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0310.1997.tb00006.x

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Sympatric species of threespine stickleb

Sympatric species of threespine stickleback differ in their performance in a spatial learning task

✍ Lucy C. Odling-Smee; Janette W. Boughman; Victoria A. Braithwaite 📂 Article 📅 2008 🏛 Springer 🌐 English ⚖ 238 KB

Limits of spatial attention in three-dim

Limits of spatial attention in three-dimensional space and dual-task driving performance

✍ George J. Andersen; Rui Ni; Zheng Bian; Julie Kang 📂 Article 📅 2011 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 620 KB

STEREOTYPE THREAT AND GENDER DIFFERENCES

STEREOTYPE THREAT AND GENDER DIFFERENCES IN PERFORMANCE ON A NOVEL VISUOSPATIAL TASK

✍ Susan Miller Campbell; Marcia L. Collaer 📂 Article 📅 2009 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 124 KB

Effects of DSP4 and methylphenidate on s

Effects of DSP4 and methylphenidate on spatial memory performance in rats

✍ Thomas A. Sontag; Joachim Hauser; Oliver Tucha; Klaus W. Lange 📂 Article 📅 2011 🏛 Springer Vienna 🌐 English ⚖ 528 KB

Neuronal firing rates account for distra

Neuronal firing rates account for distractor effects on mnemonic accuracy in a visuo-spatial working memory task

✍ Julian Macoveanu; Torkel Klingberg; Jesper Tegnér 📂 Article 📅 2007 🏛 Springer-Verlag 🌐 English ⚖ 600 KB

Effects of ethanol and temazepam on perf

Effects of ethanol and temazepam on performance in memory and psychomotor tasks: a dose-response comparison

✍ B. Tiplady; H. Faineteau; A. Loganathan; M. Spiegelberg; Z. Taylor; P. Wright 📂 Article 📅 1998 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 140 KB 👁 2 views

In order to compare the eects of ethanol and a benzodiazepine on psychomotor performance and memory, 15 subjects (nine male, six female) aged 20±27 years took part in a ®ve-period crossover study in which they received by mouth in randomised order: (1) ethanol 0 . 88 g/kg, maximum 66 g for males, 55