𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Specialists and synthesists in a question answering community

✍ Scribed by Rich Gazan

Publisher
Wiley (John Wiley & Sons)
Year
2007
Tongue
English
Weight
35 KB
Volume
43
Category
Article
ISSN
0044-7870

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis

Abstract

The most sustainable online communities are those that allow and encourage their users to have a voice in how the community evolves. The proliferation of online communities with collaborative filtering mechanisms, where user feedback is aggregated to shape future interactions, makes it necessary to understand why participants in online communities value the content they do. Building on the concepts of users as specialists and synthesists developed in previous research, this study examines Answerbag, an online question answering community where users rate one another's answers to provide collaborative filtering. In this environment, specialists are operationalized as those who claim expertise in a given topic and answer questions without referencing other sources, and synthesists as those who include one or more references to external sources in their answers. The results of the study suggest that within the Answerbag community as a whole, the answers of synthesists tended to be rated more highly than those of specialists, though answers provided by specialists were rated more highly within certain categories. The consequences of differences in the perceived value of information provided by specialists and synthesists are examined, and avenues for future research are discussed.

πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES

Knowledge trees and protoforms in questi
Knowledge trees and protoforms in question-answering systems
✍ Ronald R. Yager πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2006 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 190 KB

## Abstract We point out that question‐answering systems differ from other information‐seeking applications, such as search engines, by having a deduction capability, an ability to answer questions by a synthesis of information residing in different parts of its knowledge base. This capability requ

Building a reusable test collection for
Building a reusable test collection for question answering
✍ Jimmy Lin; Boris Katz πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2006 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 199 KB

## Abstract In contrast to traditional information retrieval systems, which return ranked lists of documents that users must manually browse through, a question answering system attempts to directly answer natural language questions posed by the user. Although such systems possess language‐processi

Social reference and digital reference:
Social reference and digital reference: Online question answering practices in two diverse communities
✍ Pnina Shachaf; Howard Rosenbaum; Eileen Abels; Marie Radford; Lynn Silipigni Con πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2009 πŸ› Wiley (John Wiley & Sons) 🌐 English βš– 38 KB

## Abstract This panel brings together researchers who focus on Q A sites, those that focus on digital reference, and those who bridge between the two, into what we believe will be a lively discussion.

Cogex: A semantically and contextually e
Cogex: A semantically and contextually enriched logic prover for question answering
✍ Dan Moldovan; Christine Clark; Sanda Harabagiu; Daniel Hodges πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2007 πŸ› Elsevier Science 🌐 English βš– 333 KB

This paper presents the architecture and functionality of a logic prover designed for question answering. The approach transforms questions and answer passages into logic representations based on syntactic, semantic and contextual information. World knowledge supplements the linguistic, ontological,