A powerful indictment of contemporary attacks on free speech, this book argues for a vigorous First Amendment jurisprudence protecting even offensive types of speech. In recent years, political activists, academics, and legal specialists have attacked traditional notions of free speech protection as
Speaking Back: The Free Speech versus Hate Speech Debate
β Scribed by Katharine Gelber
- Publisher
- John Benjamins
- Year
- 2002
- Tongue
- English
- Leaves
- 192
- Series
- Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture 1
- Category
- Library
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
This book proposes an original policy framework for addressing hate speech. Gelber argues that a policy designed to provide support to affected groups and communities to enable them to speak back when hate speech occurs, is a more useful way of addressing the harms of hate speech than punitive measures. She suggests that βspeaking backβ allows the affected groups to contradict the messages contained in the words of the hate speakers, and to counteract the silencing, disempowering and marginalising effects of hate speech. Gelberβs argument uniquely synthesises the ideas of defending the importance of participating in speech, recognising the harms of hate speech and acknowledging that targeted groups may require assistance to respond.
β¦ Subjects
Communication Words Language Grammar Reference Test Preparation Linguistics Media Studies Social Sciences Politics Humanities New Used Rental Textbooks Specialty Boutique Communications Journalism
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
<p>Free speech is guaranteed under the First Amendment. Although it may hurt and offend, hate speech is still free, under most circumstances. But what happens when institutions like universities adopt policies prohibiting offensive speech? Do such policies cause more harm than good? Should measures
158 pages ; 24 cm