Some INDO calculations of 1J(PN) values
✍ Scribed by S. Duangthai; G. A. Webb
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 1982
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 280 KB
- Volume
- 20
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0749-1581
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
Abstract
Self consistent perturbation theory calculations of ^1^J(PN) are performed using INDO parameters. The change in sign of the coupling upon passing from tri‐ to penta‐valent phosphorus arises from the influence of the phosphorus lone‐pair electrons. The observed coupling trends are reproduced by the variation in the contact contribution which, in turn, depends largely upon the s character of the lone‐pair electrons on the coupled nuclei. There appears to be no significant role played by the phosphorus d orbitals in the couplings considered.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Abstract Some calculations of ^1^__J__(SiC) and ^1^__J__(SiF) are performed by self‐consistent perturbation theory employing standard INDO parameters. ^1^__J__(SiC) is dominated by the contact interaction, whereas the opposite sign for ^1^__J__(SiF) is due to a large orbital interaction. The ^1^
## Abstract Standard INDO parameters are used in ‘sum‐over‐states’ perturbation calculations of ^n^__J__(NC) in a variety of molecular environments. Good agreement with the experimental data is, in general, obtained when the integral products __S__~N~^2^(o)__S__~C~^2^(o) and 〈__r__^−3^〉~N~〈__r__^−3
C and "P NMR data are reported for a series of phosphonate carbanions. In comparison with related uncharged molecules, the values of 'J(PC) are rather large. This is discussed with the help of some INDOSCPT spin-spin coupling calculations, which reveal that while the positive contact term makes the
## Abstract Self‐consistent perturbation calculations of 70 ^1^__J__(CC) values are reported within the INDO framework. A least‐squares agreement between the calculated and observed couplings, for a variety of bond multiplicities, provides values of 13.503 au^−6^ and 5.072 au^−6^ for (__S__~C~^2^(O
## Abstract INDO parameterized calculations of ^n^__J__(^19^F^15^N) are reported where __n__=1, 2, 3, 4 and 5. The calculations are performed within the sum‐over‐states perturbation and self‐consistent perturbation frameworks. In general, satisfactory agreement between both sets of calculated resul