✦ LIBER ✦

Some examples and results in the theory of mixing and random-sum central limit theorems

✍ Scribed by M. Csörgő; R. Fischler

Publisher: Springer Netherlands
Year: 1973
Tongue: English
Weight: 965 KB
Volume: 3
Category: Article
ISSN: 0031-5303
DOI: 10.1007/bf02018460

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Moment inequalities and the central limi

Moment inequalities and the central limit theorem for integrals of random fields with mixing

✍ V. V. Gorodetskii 📂 Article 📅 1987 🏛 Springer US 🌐 English ⚖ 415 KB

On rates of convergence in a random cent

On rates of convergence in a random central limit theorem and in the central limit theorem for Markov chains

✍ E. Bolthausen 📂 Article 📅 1977 🏛 Springer 🌐 English ⚖ 211 KB

Non-Uniform Estimates and Asymptotic Exp

Non-Uniform Estimates and Asymptotic Expansions of the Remainder in the Central Limit Theorem for m-Dependent Random Variables

✍ Lothar Heinrich 📂 Article 📅 1984 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 459 KB 👁 1 views

Rates of Convergence in Stable Limit The

Rates of Convergence in Stable Limit Theorems for Sums of Exponentially Ψ-mixing Random Variables with an Application to Metric Theory of Continued Fractions

✍ Lothar Heinrich 📂 Article 📅 1987 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 699 KB

Mixing properties, differentiability of

Mixing properties, differentiability of the free energy and the central limit theorem for a pure phase in the Ising model at low temperature

✍ Anders Martin-Löf 📂 Article 📅 1973 🏛 Springer 🌐 English ⚖ 942 KB

Ann. Pure Appl. Logic: Erratum to “What'

Ann. Pure Appl. Logic: Erratum to “What's so special about Kruskal's theorem and the ordinal Γ0? A survey of some results in proof theory” [53 (1991) 199–260]

✍ Jean H. Gallier 📂 Article 📅 1997 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 77 KB

Gopalan Nadathur has pointed out that there is a gap in the proof of Theorem 4.5, pp. 2077208. Specifically, there is a gap in the proof of the claim that 5 is a WC~~> on 9 (line 11 of p. 208). The problem is that even though tk 3 t,. the proof does not ensure that k < 11 (line 16 of p. 208). Howeve