𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Some confusion concerning integral isoconversional methods that may result from the paper by Budrugeac and Segal “Some Methodological Problems Concerning Nonisothermal Kinetic Analysis of Heterogeneous Solid–Gas Reactions”

✍ Scribed by Sergey Vyazovkin


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2002
Tongue
English
Weight
100 KB
Volume
34
Category
Article
ISSN
0538-8066

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Abstract

Budrugeac and Segal (Int. J. Chem. Kinet. 33, 564, 2001) have generally criticized the integral isoconversional methods for producing a systematic error in the activation energy, whose value varies with the extent of conversion. We stress that this error is practically eliminated in the advanced integral isoconversional methods when using integration over small time segments (Vyazovkin, S. J. Comput Chem. 22, 178, 2001) © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Int J Chem Kinet 34: 418–420, 2002


📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES


Some methodological problems concerning
✍ P. Budrugeac; E. Segal 📂 Article 📅 2001 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 193 KB

## Abstract Isoconversional methods, those using only one curve α = α(T) (α is the conversion degree and T is the temperature), and invariant kinetic parameter method were applied to estimate the kinetic parameters from the following nonisothermal data: (1) simulated TG curves for a single reaction