𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Solid/liquid- and vapor-phase interactions between cellulose- and lignin-derived pyrolysis products

✍ Scribed by Takashi Hosoya; Haruo Kawamoto; Shiro Saka


Publisher
Elsevier Science
Year
2009
Tongue
English
Weight
947 KB
Volume
85
Category
Article
ISSN
0165-2370

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Solid/liquid- and vapor-phase interactions between cellulose- and lignin (Japanese cedar milled wood lignin)-derived pyrolysis products were studied under the conditions of N2/600°C/40–80s. A dual-space closed ampoule reactor was used to eliminate the solid/liquid-phase interactions, and careful comparison of the resulting data with those of the pyrolysis of the mixed samples gave some insights into the solid/liquid- and vapor-phase interactions separately. With the solid/liquid-phase interactions, the tar yields from both cellulose and lignin increased with the decreasing yields of the char fractions in a short pyrolysis time of 40s (primary pyrolysis stage). Most of the identified tar components from cellulose and lignin increased in their yields. The vapor-phase interactions were significant at a longer pyrolysis time of 80s (secondary reaction stage) when the methoxyl groups of the lignin-derived volatiles were cleaved homolytically. The vapor-phase interactions accelerated the gas formation from the cellulose-derived volatiles with suppressing the vapor-phase char formation of the lignin-derived volatiles. The yields of methane and catechols from lignin also increased greatly instead of the formation of o-cresols. Most of these influences are explained with a proposed interaction mechanism, in which the cellulose-derived volatiles act as H-donors while the lignin-derived volatiles (radicals) act as H-acceptors.


📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES


Studies of interactions between silane c
✍ Marie-Christine B. Salon; Guillaume Gerbaud; M. Abdelmouleh; Cécile Bruzzese; Sa 📂 Article 📅 2007 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 466 KB

## Abstract The hydrolysis of three alkoxy‐silane coupling agents, γ‐methacryloxypropyl trimethoxy silane (MPS), γ‐aminopropyl triethoxy silane (APS), and γ‐diethylenetriaminopropyl trimethoxy silane (TAS), was carried out in ethanol/water solutions (80/20 w/w) at different pH values and followed b