𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Solar cycle length hypothesis appears to support the ipcc on global warming

✍ Scribed by P. Laut; J. Gundermann


Publisher
Elsevier Science
Year
1998
Tongue
English
Weight
421 KB
Volume
60
Category
Article
ISSN
1364-6826

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Since the discovery of a striking correlation between 0!1!1!1!0 _ltered solar cycle lengths and the 00!year running average of northern hemisphere land air temperatures\ there have been widespread speculations as to whether these _ndings would rule out any signi_cant contributions to global warming from the enhanced concentrations of greenhouse gases[ The {solar hypothesis| "as we shall term this assumption# claims that solar activity causes a signi_cant component of the global mean temperature to vary in phase opposite to the _ltered solar cycle lengths[ In an earlier article we have demonstrated that for data covering the period 0759Ð0879 the solar hypothesis does not rule out any signi_cant contribution from man!made greenhouse gases and sulphate aerosols[ The present analysis goes a step further[ We analyse the period 0468Ð0876 and _nd that the solar hypothesis*instead of contradicting*appears to support the assumption of a signi_cant warming due to human activities[ We have tentatively {corrected| the historical northern hemisphere land air temperature anomalies by removing the assumed e}ects of human activities[ These are represented by northern hemisphere land air temperature anomalies calculated as the contributions from man!made greenhouse gases and sulphate aerosols by using an upwelling di}usion!energy balance model similar to the model of Wigley and Raper "0882# employed in the Second Assessment Report of The Interovernmental Panel on Climate Chane "IPCC#[ It turns out that the agreement of the _ltered solar cycle lengths with the {corrected| temperature anomalies is substantially better than with the historical anomalies\ with the mean square deviation reduced by 25) for a climate sensitivity of 1[4>C\ the central value of the IPCC assessment\ and by 32) for the best!_t value of 0[6>C[ Therefore our _ndings support a total reversal of the common assumption that a veri_cation of the solar hypothesis would challenge the IPCC assessment of man!made global warming[ Þ 0888 Elsevier Science Ltd[ All rights reserved[ Keywords] Solar cycle lengths^Solar activity^Sunspot numbers^Global warming^Greenhouse gases^Upwelling di}usion!energy balance model^IPCC