๐”– Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

๐Ÿ“

Socratic epistemology: explorations of knowledge-seeking by questioning

โœ Scribed by Hintikka, Jaakko


Publisher
Cambridge University Press
Year
2007
Tongue
English
Leaves
249
Category
Library

โฌ‡  Acquire This Volume

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Table of Contents


Introduction
1. Epistemology without knowledge and without belief
2. Abduction: inference, conjecture, or an answer to a question?
3. Second-generation epistemic logic and its general significance
4. Presuppositions and other limitations of inquiry
5. The place of the a priori in epistemology
6. Systems of visual identification and neuroscience: lessons from epistemic logic with John Symons
7. Logical explanations
8. Who has kidnapped the notion of information?
9. A fallacious fallacy?
10. Omitting data: ethical or strategic problem?

โœฆ Subjects


Theory of knowledge


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Socratic Epistemology: Explorations of K
โœ Jaakko Hintikka ๐Ÿ“‚ Library ๐Ÿ“… 2007 ๐Ÿ› Cambridge University Press ๐ŸŒ English

Most current work in epistemology deals with the evaluation and justification of information already acquired. In this book, Jaakko Hintikka instead discusses the more important problem of how knowledge is acquired in the first place. His model of information-seeking is the old Socratic method of

Cartographies of Knowledge: Exploring Qu
โœ Celine-Marie Pascale ๐Ÿ“‚ Library ๐Ÿ“… 2010 ๐Ÿ› SAGE Publications ๐ŸŒ English

Using clear language and concrete examples, this text<i> </i>examines theoretical and historical foundations that shape the premise and logic of qualitative social research. It analyzes qualitative methodology and methods in relationship to issues of agency, subjectivity, and experience. Rooted to f

Knowledge by Agreement: The Programme of
โœ Martin Kusch ๐Ÿ“‚ Library ๐Ÿ“… 2004 ๐ŸŒ English

Martin Kusch puts forth two controversial ideas: that knowledge is a social status (like money or marriage) and that knowledge is primarily the possession of groups rather than individuals. He defends the radical implications of his views: that knowledge is political, and that it varies with communi