Growth of the second metacarpal (MC) was evaluated during female adolescence in 110 Turkish girls who were followed longitudinally starting from 8.5 to 11 years until a Greulich and Pyle skeletal age (SA) โฅ17 years was reached. Stature (St), weight (Wt), stage of secondary sexual development (SSD),
Socioeconomic differences in growth of metacarpal II during adolescence in females: Interactions with sexual and skeletal maturity
โ Scribed by Teoman Onat
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 1997
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 474 KB
- Volume
- 9
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 1042-0533
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
โฆ Synopsis
In order to study the role of socioeconomic status (SES) in growth of the second metacarpal (MC) during adolescence in females, 352 cross-sectional observations of 34 girls from high SES 11-17 years of age were compared with 876 cross-sectional observations of age-matched low to middle SES Turkish girls. Values for MC length (L), L/outer diameter (D), total cortical thickness (C), C/L, C/D%, stature, weight, stages of secondary sexual development (SSD), and skeletal age (SA) were significantly greater in the high SES, while outer (D) and medullary diameter (M), C-area, M-area, and MC-volume were significantly smaller. The estimated total average increase in C/year was 0.21 versus 0.22 mm in low-middle and high SES girls, respectively, being twice as high before 14 years compared with at 14-17 years. The decrease in M started earlier and was steeper in the high SES. M was significantly smaller in the high SES when SSD or years before and after menarche was controlled, and also after SA of 14 years, while C was not significantly different under these conditions. M and D values for a given L were significantly greater in low-middle SES girls, while differences in C were not significant. It was concluded that reduced C for age in low-middle SES girls is a reflection of their overall slower growth relative to high SES girls, and once they catch up in growth the difference in C between groups is no longer significant. However, there still is a greater D for a given L, which is mainly due to significantly greater M for L, which was present at the beginning of the study. Am. J. Hum. Biol. 9:439-448, 1997. ยฉ 1997 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
๐ SIMILAR VOLUMES