Memory ability is affected by the physical, educational and health environments. The nature of these environments, in turn, differs across people with different socio-economic status (SES). Thus, it would be expected that memory performance would vary systematically with SES. However, memory researc
Socio-economic status, social class and memory performance: a critical response to Herrmann and Guadagno (1997)
✍ Scribed by John T. E. Richardson
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 1998
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 189 KB
- Volume
- 12
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0888-4080
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
Herrmann and Guadagno (1997) reviewed evidence concerning the relationship between memory performance and socio-economic status (SES). As a measure of social strati®cation, SES is narrow and ethnocentric, and it ignores the role of social prestige, power and status. The selection of research for quantitative analysis and the measure of eect size used by Herrmann and Guadagno are criticized. Across the available corpus of studies, there is a highly signi®cant relationship between SES and memory performance, but this varies systematically from one task to another and between dierent research studies using the same task. This indicates that the eects of SES on memory are mediated by the content and the context of learning.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
In his commentary, Richardson criticizes the analysis of the relationship between socioeconomic status (SES) and memory performance as presented by Herrmann and Guadagno (1997). Richardson's criticism addresses Herrmann and Guadagno's procedures for classifying economic backgrounds of subjects and t