✦ LIBER ✦

Social marketing leverage for heart health: The Ekaterinburg experience

✍ Scribed by Sania Nishtar; Helen Alderson; Danielle Grizeau-Clemens; Svetlana Anatolievna Shalnova; Galina Kolotova

Book ID: 119352117
Publisher: Elsevier
Year: 2008
Tongue: English
Weight: 120 KB
Volume: 3
Category: Article
ISSN: 1875-4570
DOI: 10.1016/j.precon.2007.10.002

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

The effectiveness of social marketing in

The effectiveness of social marketing interventions for health improvement: What's the evidence?

✍ Ross Gordon; Laura McDermott; Martine Stead; Kathryn Angus 📂 Article 📅 2006 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 135 KB

The importance of socio-economic context

The importance of socio-economic context for social marketing models for improving reproductive health: Evidence from 555 years of program experience

✍ Dominique Meekers; Stephen Rahaim 📂 Article 📅 2005 🏛 BioMed Central 🌐 English ⚖ 289 KB

Creating market conditions for the deliv

Creating market conditions for the delivery of health care: The cincinnati experience

✍ Thomas E. Murphy 📂 Article 📅 1995 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 984 KB

Web-Based Experiments for the Study of C

Web-Based Experiments for the Study of Collective Social Dynamics in Cultural Markets

✍ Matthew J. Salganik; Duncan J. Watts 📂 Article 📅 2009 🏛 Wiley (Blackwell Publishing) 🌐 English ⚖ 742 KB

Shared meanings or missed opportunities?

Shared meanings or missed opportunities? The implications of functional health literacy for social marketing interventions

✍ Gillian Kemp; Lynne Eagle 📂 Article 📅 2008 🏛 Springer-Verlag 🌐 English ⚖ 169 KB

Is labour market training a curse for th

Is labour market training a curse for the unemployed? Evidence from a social experiment

✍ Michael Rosholm; Lars Skipper 📂 Article 📅 2009 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 248 KB 👁 1 views

## Abstract In 1994 a social experiment was conducted in Denmark, where unemployed applicants for classroom training were randomised into treatment and control groups. The data are contaminated by the presence of no‐shows and crossovers, biasing the traditional experimental estimator. We interpret