Social constructionism is set forth as an epistemological framework from which to establish an ethical base for the field of counseling. The development of the social constructionist movement in counseling is described. Implications of a social constructionist position are considered in relation to
Social and Ethical Implications of Claims for Cancer Hazards
β Scribed by Weisburger, John H.
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 1977
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 269 KB
- Volume
- 3
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0098-1532
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
Abstract
Current data show that about 80% of human cancers can be traced to environmental causes. The majority of human cancers are associated with two main etiologic factors: smoking of cigarettes and diet, which account for most of the cancers in the respiratory tract, in the digestive tract, and in the endocrine sensitive and reproductive organs. The evidence for these multifactorial causes is both epidemiologic and experimental. In recent years a number of lay and professional groups have expressed concern that the microcontaminants in our environment are responsible for cancer in man. Agitation, press releases, and statements before legislative and executive government departments have made claims for cancer hazards which do not appear to rest on sound epidemiologic or experimental bases, yet these claims have alarmed and indeed scared the public. Government agencies and industry have spent funds to investigate such claims. It appears that such actions not only divert valuable research funds and efforts into lines which do not seem to be fruitful in leading to a reduction in cancer risk for the main human cancers, but by falsely alarming the public, dilute serious efforts of cancer prevention with respect to the experimentally and epidemiologically established cancer risks.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
Advances in molecular genetics challenge the hepatology community to understand and implement genetic knowledge. Despite excitement about the potential benefits of new genetic information, concerns have been raised about the inappropriate use of genetic testing, clinicians' incorrect ordering and mi