This paper discusses the skeptical argument presented by Keith Lehrer in his paper 'Why Not Scepticism?'. It is argued that Lehrer's argument depends on unacceptable premises, and therefore fails to establish the skeptical conclusion. On the other hand, it is also shown that even if the skeptic's op
โฆ LIBER โฆ
Skepticism and pyrolysis
โ Scribed by ThomasP. Wampler
- Publisher
- Elsevier Science
- Year
- 1994
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 234 KB
- Volume
- 28
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0165-2370
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
๐ SIMILAR VOLUMES
Skepticism and justification
โ
Risto Hilpinen
๐
Article
๐
1983
๐
Springer Netherlands
๐
English
โ 464 KB
Superstition, credulity and skepticism
โ
Whitebread, Charles
๐
Article
๐
1933
๐
Elsevier
โ 505 KB
Skepticism and floating conclusions
โ
John F. Horty
๐
Article
๐
2002
๐
Elsevier Science
๐
English
โ 147 KB
Performatives and dream skepticism
โ
Charles E. M. Dunlop
๐
Article
๐
1974
๐
Springer Netherlands
๐
English
โ 162 KB
An important contention in Norman Malcolm's monograph, Dreaming, 1 was that skepticism about one's present state (Am I awake or dreaming?) is untenable. Malcolm's book has been thoroughly and effectively criticized from a number of vantage points, but implicit in it is one argument against skepticis
On skepticism and faith
โ
Harry C. Meserve
๐
Article
๐
1990
๐
Springer
๐
English
โ 440 KB
Instrumentalism and scientific skepticis
โ
Jim Leach
๐
Article
๐
1981
๐
Springer Netherlands
๐
English
โ 528 KB