𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Size of motor unit potential sample

✍ Scribed by Simon Podnar; Mićo Mrkaić


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2003
Tongue
English
Weight
100 KB
Volume
27
Category
Article
ISSN
0148-639X

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.


📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES


Motor unit number estimation: Sample siz
✍ Michael Slawnych; Charles Laszlo; Cecil Hershler 📂 Article 📅 1997 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 141 KB 👁 2 views

A computer model of the motor unit number estimation procedure was developed to evaluate the sampling error associated with estimates of the number of motor units in muscles. Two different distributions were used to model the motor unit amplitude distribution and were chosen in such a manner that th

Quantitative motor unit analysis: The ef
✍ Dr. John W. Engstrom; Richard K. Olney 📂 Article 📅 1992 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 428 KB

This study of quantitative electromyography examines the influence of sample size on motor unit action potential (MUAP) tolerance limits, intertrial variability, and diagnostic sensitivity. We recorded 20 randomly selected MUAPs from the biceps muscle twice in 21 normal subjects, and once in 10 pati

Anal sphincter electromyography: Editing
✍ W. Thomas Gregory; Amanda L. Clark; Joshua Johnson; Kimberly Willis; Amy Stuyves 📂 Article 📅 2005 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 73 KB

## Abstract During multi‐motor unit action potential (MUAP) analysis of the tonically contracted external anal sphincter (EAS), a mild interference pattern often obscures the baseline, affecting the algorithm's ability to determine accurate boundaries of detected MUAPs. To assess the equivalence of

Motor unit size estimation of enlarged m
✍ Karin Roeleveld; Arne Sandberg; Erik V. Stålberg; Dick F. Stegeman 📂 Article 📅 1998 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 261 KB 👁 2 views

Surface EMG is hardly used to estimate motor unit (MU) characteristics, while its non-invasiveness is less stressful for patients and allows multi-electrode recordings to investigate different sites of the muscle and MU. The present study compares motor unit potentials (MUPs) obtained with surface E

F waves and motor unit size
✍ Dr. Reinhard Dengler; Dr. Andon Kossev; Dr. Kai Wohlfahrt; Dr. Margot Schubert; 📂 Article 📅 1992 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 391 KB

M responses and twitch contractions were evoked in single motor units (MUs) of the first dorsal interosseus muscle by intramuscular microstimulation of motor axons. Two-hundred nine MUs were studied in 21 subjects. Thirty-five MUs (17%) showed F waves in addition to M responses. Twitch force was use