This article describes the interplay among theory, research and practice regarding the maintenance of psychological well-being during serious illness. The ideas emerged from two independent lines of work, one that evolved through clinical practice within the medical model, the other that evolved thr
Situating Psychological Well-Being: Exploring the Cultural Roots of Its Theory and Research
β Scribed by John Chambers Christopher
- Book ID
- 102285853
- Publisher
- American Counseling Association
- Year
- 1999
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 360 KB
- Volume
- 77
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 1556-6678
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
Psychological well-being is a seminal concept in counseling and yet it is seldom discussed, researched, or critiqued; this article examines the cultural values and assumptions underlying its theory and research. Contemporary understandings of psychological and subjective well-being are placed in cultural and historical context to illuminate their Euro-American cultural roots. Approaches to psychological well-being are shown to presuppose ontological and liberal individualism as notions of the self and as normative prescriptions for the good or ideal person. It is argued that culture-free theories or measures of well-being are unattainable; all understandings of psychological well-being are based on moral visions.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
This study examined the relationships among spiritual well-being, quality of life, and psychological adjustment in 142 women diagnosed with breast cancer who were participating in a larger study designed to compare the efficacy of two psychosocial support programs. Participants were given a set of q
The Chinese version of the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (C-STAI) was administered to 2,150 Chinese secondary school students, along with other measures of psychological well-being. The results showed that the correlation between A-State and A-Trait scores was significant, and both scales correlated
Following publication of this paper in the September-October 1999 issue of Psycho-Oncology (8:(5), 429-438), it came to our attention that the authors' institutions were incorrect. Ms Cotton and Ms Fitzpatrick are at the