Site-specific familial aggregation of prostate cancer
✍ Scribed by Bas A.J. Verhage; Katja K.H. Aben; J. Alfred Witjes; Huub Straatman; Jack A. Schalken; Lambertus A.L.M. Kiemeney
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2004
- Tongue
- French
- Weight
- 87 KB
- Volume
- 109
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0020-7136
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
Abstract
Over the last decade, epidemiologic evidence has accumulated in favor of a significant but heterogeneous hereditary component in prostate cancer (PC) susceptibility. In order to map and clone PC susceptibility genes, stratification of PC families into genetically homogeneous groups appears to be a key issue. Subset definition based on age at diagnosis, presumed mode of inheritance, number of affecteds per family and coaggregation of PC with other cancers has already proven successful in some studies. Previously, the finding of the coaggregation of malignancies of the central nervous system within PC families helped to link a prostate‐brain cancer susceptibility gene (CAPB) to chromosome 1p36. In this study, we evaluate the risk of PC and malignancies at other sites among first‐degree relatives of a large population‐based group of Dutch PC patients. A population‐based family case‐control study was initiated that included Caucasian PC patients newly diagnosed between July 1996 and December 1999. Information on 12,575 first‐degree relatives of 704 PC patients and 1,371 controls was collected through postal questionnaires and telephone interviews. All reported PC in first‐degree relatives was verified through medical records. In our population, PC has a strong familial component that is reflected by a 2.9‐fold increased risk (95% CI = 2.2–3.9) of PC for first‐degree relatives of PC patients. This familial risk was somewhat higher among brothers (hazard ratio = 3.9; 95% CI = 2.4–6.4) compared to fathers (hazard ratio = 2.5; 95% CI = 1.7–3.6). Cancers at other sites did not coaggregate with PC. Our data suggest that familial PC, at least in this Western European population, is site‐specific, not part of an inherited cancer syndrome. © 2004 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Abstract Breast cancer histologies show important differences in their incidence pattern, method of detection and management. Aggregation of breast cancer occurs also in families diagnosed for cancer at sites different from the breast. Therefore, the familial association of histology specific br
## Abstract ## BACKGROUND Familial risks by proband status and age are useful for clinical counseling, and they can be used to calculate population‐attributable fractions (PAFs), which show the proportion of disease that could be prevented if the cause could be removed. ## METHODS The authors us
Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) is a wellcharacterized human prostate-specific glycoprotein. PSA has been shown to be the most effective immunohistologic marker for prostate cancer, as well as the most useful serologic test in staging and monitoring prostate cancer and in early detection of recurren
Site-specific familial aggregation and evidence supporting Mendelian codominant inheritance have been shown in lung cancer. In characterizing lung cancer families, a number of other cancers have been observed. The current study evaluates whether first-degree relatives of early onset lung cancer case