𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Single dose inactivated hepatitis A vaccine: Rationale and clinical assessment of the safety and immunogenicity

✍ Scribed by Dr. P. van Damme; C. Matheï; S. Thoelen; A. Meheus; A. Safary; F. E. André


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
1994
Tongue
English
Weight
537 KB
Volume
44
Category
Article
ISSN
0146-6615

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Abstract

In comparison with the classical immunisation schedules (0‐1‐6 or 0‐1‐12 months) for hepatitis A, a 0‐ and 12‐ or a 0‐ and 6‐month schedule would have important advantages by reducing the number of injections and discomfort and increasing scheduling convenience and patient compliance. It would be convenient if a single dose with enough antigen could protect both rapidly and for at least 12 months, when the booster dose would be given. Several clinical trials have been carried out with an inactivated hepatitis A vaccine containing 1,440 ELU. (1 ml), according to a 0–12 and a 0–6 vaccination schedule.

This hepatitis A vaccine is safe and well tolerated. It offers a rapid seroresponse: 14 days after a single dose the seroconversion is 88% (95% C.I.: 84.6–90.9). The 0–12 schedule study showed good persistence of hepatitis A virus (HAV) antibodies with a seroconversion rate of almost 95% at month 12. Booster doses given at 6 or 12 months result in a substantial rise in antibody levels; according to these antibody litres, the 1,440 EL. U. vaccine can be expected to confer comparable duration of protection as the 720 EL. U. vaccine, i.e., 10–20 years. Preliminary data show that tinning of the booster may not be critical for the antibody response.

In conclusion, the 1,440 EL. U. hepatitis A vaccine is safe, offers rapid seroconversion, and is highly immunogenic. The persistence of HAV antibodies until month 12 allows a certain flexibility in the administration of the booster: month 6 or 12, and a 0–12 or 0–6 schedule can increase the vaccination compliance. copy; 1994 Wiiey‐Liss, inc.


📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES


Immunogenicity and safety of a new inact
✍ Dr. Christian Goilav; Jane Zuckerman; Michael Lafrenz; Emmanuel Vidor; Sabine La 📂 Article 📅 1995 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 668 KB

## Abstract A multicentre, controlled, randomised, open, comparative trial including 839 healthy adult volunteers was carried out in order to compare the immunogenicity and reactogenicity of two vaccines against hepatitis A virus (HAV) during primary immunization and after booster injection. The fi

Safety and immunogenicity of inactivated
✍ Lee, Shou-Dong; Chan, Cho-Yu; Yu, May-Ing; Wang, Yuan-Jen; Chang, Full-Young; Lo 📂 Article 📅 1997 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 298 KB 👁 2 views

The safety and immunogenicity of inactivated hepatitis A vaccine was evaluated in patients with chronic liver disease. Sixty hepatitis A virus antibody (anti-HAV) seronegative patients with chronic liver disease (56 chronic hepatitis B and four chronic hepatitis C) and from 17 to 47 years of age rec

Immunogenicity and safety of an inactiva
✍ Dr. Georg Hess; Ralf Clemens; Ulrich Bienzle; Christian Schönfeld; Birgit Schunc 📂 Article 📅 1995 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 394 KB

The immunogenicity, reactogenicity, and safety of an inactivated hepatitis A vaccine were assessed in anti-HIV positive homosexual men. Fourteen anti-HIV positive (group 1) and 20 anti-HIV negative (group 2) men received vaccine (containing 720 ELISA units of hepatitis A antigen per dose) intramuscu

Immunogenicity and safety in adults of h
✍ H. Briem; A. Safary 📂 Article 📅 1994 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 288 KB

## Abstract An inactivated vaccine against hepatitis A was administered as a single 1,440 enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) units dose at month 0 with a booster at month 6 to 200 subjects divided into two age groups: group 1, 20–39 years (n = 134) and group II, 40–62 years (n = 66). At day

Background, rationale, and design of a c
✍ Sherrill J. Slichter 📂 Article 📅 2006 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 117 KB 👁 1 views

## Abstract Outlined is the background and rationale for the initiation of a randomized prospective platelet transfusion trial to evaluate the effects of platelet dose on hemostasis and platelet utilization rates. This clinical trial is being performed by the newly established Transfusion Medicine/