๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

Simultaneous sign tests for marginal homogeneity of square contingency tables

โœ Scribed by W. Lehmacher


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
1980
Tongue
English
Weight
183 KB
Volume
22
Category
Article
ISSN
0323-3847

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


A Comparison of Tests for Marginal Homog
โœ Prof. Dr. J. Krauth ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1985 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 642 KB

several asymptotic tats were proposed for testing the null hypothesis of marginal homogeneity in square oontingency tables with r categories. A simulation study was performed for comparing the power at four finite conservative conditional test procedures and of two asymptotic tests for twelve differ

Tables of Bonferroni-limits for Simultan
โœ E. Dunkl; O. Ludwig; R. Lotz ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2007 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 774 KB

A table of Bonferroni Chi-square limits is given for R simultaneous tests, where R = l(1) 30( ) 150 at the level of a =0.05 for 1 to 100 degrees of freedom. At the level a =0.01 the limits are given for R = l ( l ) 30, correspondingly. Additionally, a table of Bonferroni Chi-square limits for 1 degr

Analysis of Square Contingency Tables wi
โœ Dr. Sadao Tomizawa ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1987 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 408 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 2 views

For square contingency tables with ordered categories, this note proposes a new method of applying TOMIZAWA'S (1987) 1-weight modified marginal homogeneity model8 and applies to the 4 x4 tables on unaided vision a n a l p d by TOHIZAWA (1987) and by ~T U A B T (1955). A possible explanation which is

Comparisons of Some Chi-squared Tests fo
โœ H. B. Lawal; G. J. G. Uptong ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1990 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 609 KB

## Abstract We consider in this paper, the behaviour of a class of the CRESSIE READ (1984) power divergence test statistics indexed by parameter ฮป โ€ __I__ (ฮป), with the modified __X__~2~ test statistics (LU) proposed by LAWAL and UPTON (1984), for sparse contingency tables ranging from the 3ร—3 to t