๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

Simultaneous optimal selection of design and manufacturing tolerances with alternative manufacturing process selection

โœ Scribed by K. Sivakumar; C. Balamurugan; S. Ramabalan


Publisher
Elsevier Science
Year
2011
Tongue
English
Weight
747 KB
Volume
43
Category
Article
ISSN
0010-4485

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis


Tolerance specification is an important part of mechanical design. Design tolerances strongly influence the functional performance and manufacturing cost of a mechanical product. Tighter tolerances normally produce superior components, better performing mechanical systems and good assemblability with assured exchangeability at the assembly line. However, unnecessarily tight tolerances lead to excessive manufacturing costs for a given application. The balancing of performance and manufacturing cost through identification of optimal design tolerances is a major concern in modern design. Traditionally, design tolerances are specified based on the designer's experience. Computer-aided (or software-based) tolerance synthesis and alternative manufacturing process selection programs allow a designer to verify the relations between all design tolerances to produce a consistent and feasible design. In this paper, a general new methodology using intelligent algorithms viz., Elitist Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm (NSGA-II) and Multi Objective Particle Swarm Optimization (MOPSO) for simultaneous optimal selection of design and manufacturing tolerances with alternative manufacturing process selection is presented. The problem has a multi-criterion character in which 3 objective functions, 3 constraints and 5 variables are considered. The average fitness factor method and normalized weighted objective functions method are separately used to select the best optimal solution from Pareto optimal fronts. Two multiobjective performance measures namely solution spread measure and ratio of non-dominated individuals are used to evaluate the strength of Pareto optimal fronts. Two more multi-objective performance measures namely optimiser overhead and algorithm effort are used to find the computational effort of NSGA-II and MOPSO algorithms. The Pareto optimal fronts and results obtained from various techniques are compared and analysed.


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Optimal tolerance allocation and process
๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2004 ๐Ÿ› Society of Manufacturing Engineers ๐ŸŒ English โš– 123 KB

This paper reviews Genichi Taguchi's contributions to the field of quality and manufacturing engineering from both a statistical and an engineering viewpoint. His major contributions are first listed and then described in a systematic and analytical manner. The concepts underlying Taguchi's univaria

Designing of engineering components for
โœ K.L. Edwards ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2003 ๐Ÿ› Elsevier Science โš– 924 KB

Choosing the optimal material and manufacturing process combination for a given engineering component application is mostly non-trivial and involves considerable design expertise and experience. This choice is not made in isolation of a lot of other conflicting design issues, technical and non-techn