✦ LIBER ✦

Simple injective subfactors

✍ Scribed by Roberto Longo

Publisher: Elsevier Science
Year: 1987
Tongue: English
Weight: 993 KB
Volume: 63
Category: Article
ISSN: 0001-8708
DOI: 10.1016/0001-8708(87)90051-x

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

On injective hulls of simple modules

✍ Y. Hirano 📂 Article 📅 2000 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 537 KB

We characterize a ring over which every left module of finite length has an injective hull of finite length. Using this, we show that finite normalizing extensions of such a ring also have the same property. We also consider rings having the property that the injective hull of every simple module is

On Dual Pairs and Simple-Injective Modul

On Dual Pairs and Simple-Injective Modules

✍ Mari Morimoto; Takeshi Sumioka 📂 Article 📅 2000 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 148 KB

∑-injective modules

✍ Istvän Beck 📂 Article 📅 1972 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 925 KB

Lattices of Intermediate Subfactors

✍ Yasuo Watatani 📂 Article 📅 1996 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 807 KB

Let N be an irreducible subfactor of a type II 1 factor M. If the Jones index [M : N] is finite, then the set Lat(N/M) of the intermediate subfactors for the inclusion N/M forms a finite lattice. The commuting and co-commuting square conditions for intermediate subfactors are related to the modular

On Automorphisms of Subfactors

✍ Phan H. Loi 📂 Article 📅 1996 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 694 KB

We classify, up to outer conjugacy, free actions of Z on an inclusion of hyperfinite type II 1 factors of finite index, of finite depth, and for which the principal graph is one of the following: A n , n 2, E 6 , E 8 , or a finite group. As a consequence, we obtain the classification of hyperfinite

Quantum Galois Correspondence for Subfac

Quantum Galois Correspondence for Subfactors

✍ Yasuyuki Kawahigashi 📂 Article 📅 1999 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 153 KB

Ocneanu has obtained a certain type of quantized Galois correspondence for the Jones subfactors of type A n and his arguments are quite general. By making use of them in a more general context, we define a notion of a subequivalent paragroup and establish a bijective correspondence between generaliz