Similarity measures, author cocitation analysis, and information theory
β Scribed by Loet Leydesdorff
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2005
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 69 KB
- Volume
- 56
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 1532-2882
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
Abstract
The use of Pearson's correlation coefficient in Author Cocitation Analysis was compared with Salton's cosine measure in a number of recent contributions. Unlike the Pearson correlation, the cosine is insensitive to the number of zeros. However, one has the option of applying a logarithmic transformation in correlation analysis. Information calculus is based on both the logarithmic transformation and provides a nonβparametric statistics. Using this methodology, one can cluster a document set in a precise way and express the differences in terms of bits of information. The algorithm is explained and used on the data set, which was made the subject of this discussion.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Abstract In their article βRequirements for a cocitation similarity measure, with special reference to Pearson's correlation coefficient,β Ahlgren, Jarneving, and Rousseau fault traditional author cocitation analysis (ACA) for using Pearson's __r__ as a measure of similarity between authors beca
## Abstract Contentβbased image retrieval is based on the idea of extracting visual features from image and using them to index images in a database. The comparisons that determine similarity between images depend on the representations of the features and the definition of appropriate distance fun