𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Signalling overhead for ASBA in an MC-CDMA system

✍ Scribed by Zhang, Ying ;Costa, Elena ;Lott, Matthias


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2006
Tongue
English
Weight
201 KB
Volume
17
Category
Article
ISSN
1124-318X

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Cramer–Rao bound and minimum variance un
✍ Amir Seirafian; Vahid Tabataba Vakily πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2009 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 177 KB

## Abstract Exact closed‐form expressions of the Cramer–Rao bound (CRB) for joint sampling clock offset and channel taps are obtained in multi‐carrier code division multiple access systems. CRB is undoubtedly the most well known variance's bound to determine. It provides a benchmark against which w

An inexpensive video signal multiplexer
✍ Gary W. Kramer; Peter J. Grandsard πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1998 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 208 KB πŸ‘ 1 views

A computer-controlled multiplexer that selects one of up to eight video signal sources is described. The unit is used in conjunction with inexpensive charge-coupled-device video cameras, a frame grabber and computer interface, and commercially available image analysis software to detect events in an

Lack of promoting effects of chronic exp
✍ Tomoyuki Shirai; Toshio Ichihara; Kanako Wake; So-ichi Watanabe; Yukio Yamanaka; πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2007 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 187 KB πŸ‘ 2 views

## Abstract The present study was performed to evaluate effects of a 2‐year exposure to an electromagnetic near‐field (EMF) equivalent to that generated by cellular phones on tumor development in the central nervous system (CNS) of rats. For this purpose, pregnant F344 rats were given a single admi

A signal- and noise-measurement procedur
✍ Victor Rabinovich; Basim Al-Khateeb; Barbara Oakley; Nikolai Alexandrov πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2005 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 152 KB

ing-frequency bands was constructed. In this case, ⌬l is set to be 0 mm, and the dimensions of s and d are selected to be 4 and 19.5 mm, respectively. The measured and simulated (by IE3D) return losses against frequency for antenna A are shown in Figure 2. Agreement between them is satisfactory, exc