𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Signal-to-noise ratio comparison between surface coils and implanted coils

✍ Scribed by Lance L. Arnder; Mark D. Shattuck; Robert D. Black; Elaine G. Fitzsimons


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
1996
Tongue
English
Weight
659 KB
Volume
35
Category
Article
ISSN
0740-3194

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Abstract

The signal‐to‐noise ratio (SNR) from implanted coils is widely known to be superior to that from surface coils. This article addresses the quantitative aspects of this improvement by explicitly evaluating the magnetic vector potential in a conducting medium of finite extent for both implanted and surface coils. The predictions of the model are tested with actual image data from spin warp experiments on gelatin phantoms. The authors derived a simplified expression that yields the gain in SNR of an implanted coil relative to that of a surface coil and is valid in many practical situations.


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Optimized radiofrequency coils for incre
✍ S. E. Hurlston; G. P. Cofer; G. A. Johnson πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1997 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 202 KB

The signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) is a major obstacle to system noise, and (b) closer coupling between the sample and achieving increased resolution in magnetic resonance microscopy the coil for improved receiver efficiency. These design constraints (MRM). The SNR considerations for MRM are presented,

Maximizing Signal-to-Noise Ratio in the
✍ G.R. Duensing; H.R. Brooker; J.R. Fitzsimmons πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1996 πŸ› Elsevier Science 🌐 English βš– 129 KB

Crosstalk due to coupling produces noise correlation between be combined and two specific circuit examples are developed receiver coils. It has been stated that this correlation reduces the to illustrate the general approach. In a succeeding section, signal-to-noise ratio obtainable from combining s