Previous studies showed that there are certain features suggestive of a psychogenic disorder, and Fahn and Williams proposed criteria for psychogenic movement disorders. Data on the sensitivity and specificity of these criteria are lacking. We expanded on the Fahn and Williams criteria to create a n
SIC Task Force appraisal of clinical diagnostic criteria for parkinsonian disorders
✍ Scribed by Irene Litvan; Kailash P. Bhatia; David J. Burn; Christopher G. Goetz; Anthony E. Lang; Ian McKeith; Niall Quinn; Kapil D. Sethi; Cliff Shults; Gregor K. Wenning
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2003
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 148 KB
- Volume
- 18
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0885-3185
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
Abstract
As there are no biological markers for the antemortem diagnosis of degenerative parkinsonian disorders, diagnosis currently relies upon the presence and progression of clinical features and confirmation depends on neuropathology. Clinicopathologic studies have shown significant false‐positive and false‐negative rates for diagnosing these disorders, and misdiagnosis is especially common during the early stages of these diseases. It is important to establish a set of widely accepted diagnostic criteria for these disorders that may be applied and reproduced in a blinded fashion. This review summarizes the findings of the SIC Task Force for the study of diagnostic criteria for parkinsonian disorders in the areas of Parkinson's disease, dementia with Lewy bodies, progressive supranuclear palsy, multiple system atrophy, and corticobasal degeneration. In each of these areas, diagnosis continues to rest on clinical findings and the judicious use of ancillary studies. © 2003 Movement Disorder Society
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES