Sialyl Tn antigen is an independent predictor of outcome in patients with gastric cancer
β Scribed by Mikael Victorzon; Stig Nordling; Olle Nilsson; Peter J. Roberts; Caj Haglund
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 1996
- Tongue
- French
- Weight
- 748 KB
- Volume
- 65
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0020-7136
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
The prognostic value of the immunohistochemical expression of Sialyl Tn antigen (STn) was evaluated in 242 patients with gastric carcinoma. Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded specimens of gastric adenocarcinomas were stained with the monoclonal antibody C 1282, produced by immunization with ovine submaxillary mucin (OSM). Positive immunoreactivity for STn was observed in 149 (62Y0) patients. The expression of STn did not correlate with stage of disease (TNM), tumour location, presence of lymph-node or distant metastases, histological type. age or gender. STn immunoreactivity correlated strongly with overall survival in univariate analysis. The median survival in the STn-positive group was 2 I months, in comparison to 38 months in the STn-negative group. The difference in survival between STn-negative and STn-positive tumours was significant in patients with stage-I cancer, but not in patients with stage41 -111 or Wdisease. STn immunoreactivity emerged as an independent prognostic factor in Cox multivariate analysis. It is concluded that the immunohistochemical expression of STn is a good marker in the prediction of survival in patients with stage-I gastric carcinoma.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
Background. Several studies have revealed a correlation between sialosyl Tn antigen (STN) and certain clinicopathologic features of various cancers, and that STN is an independent prognostic factor. However, the clinical significance of the expression of STN in gastric cancer has not been reported.
Twelve variables were studied for possible prognostic value in 242 patients with adenocarcinoma of the stomach. Eight of these had a statistically significant effect on survival in univariate analyses. A multivariate analysis of I96 patients showed that the most significant differences in survival c