✦ LIBER ✦

Shtukas and Jacobi sums

✍ Scribed by Dinesh S. Thakur

Book ID: 105128024
Publisher: Springer-Verlag
Year: 1993
Tongue: English
Weight: 794 KB
Volume: 111
Category: Article
ISSN: 0020-9910
DOI: 10.1007/bf01231298

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Congruences for Jacobi Sums

✍ Ronald Evans 📂 Article 📅 1998 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 249 KB

A congruence for Jacobi sums of order k over finite fields is proved, which generalizes a congruence of for prime k and Ihara (1986) for prime power k. Related congruences for Jacobi sums are also presented. The techniques are elementary and self-contained, in contrast with the deep methods of Iwas

Reciprocity for Jacobi Sums

✍ C. Helou 📂 Article 📅 1993 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 202 KB

Jacobi Sum Matrices

✍ Sam Vandervelde 📂 Article 📅 2012 🏛 Mathematical Association of America 🌐 English ⚖ 974 KB

Supplementary difference sets and Jacobi

Supplementary difference sets and Jacobi sums

✍ Mieko Yamada 📂 Article 📅 1992 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 752 KB

Yamada, M., Supplementary difference sets and Jacobi sums, Discrete Mathematics 103 (1992) 75-90. Let 4 = ef + 1 be an odd prime power and C,, 1 =Z i =S e -1, be cyclotomic classes of the eth power residues in F = GF(q). Let Ai with #A, = ujr 1 =~i Sn, be non-empty subsets of Q={O,l,..., e-l}andletD

Best approximation and the Fourier-Jacob

Best approximation and the Fourier-Jacobi sums

✍ I. I. Sharapudinov 📂 Article 📅 1983 🏛 SP MAIK Nauka/Interperiodica 🌐 English ⚖ 439 KB

Gauss Sums, Jacobi Sums, and p-Ranks of

Gauss Sums, Jacobi Sums, and p-Ranks of Cyclic Difference Sets

✍ Ronald Evans; Henk D.L. Hollmann; Christian Krattenthaler; Qing Xiang 📂 Article 📅 1999 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 301 KB

We study quadratic residue difference sets, GMW difference sets, and difference sets arising from monomial hyperovals, all of which are (2 d &1, 2 d&1 &1, 2 d&2 &1) cyclic difference sets in the multiplicative group of the finite field F 2 d of 2 d elements, with d 2. We show that, except for a few