Shrubs, streamflow, and the paradox of scale
β Scribed by Bradford P. Wilcox; M. Keith Owens; William A. Dugas; Darrell N. Ueckert; Charles R. Hart
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2006
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 200 KB
- Volume
- 20
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0885-6087
- DOI
- 10.1002/hyp.6330
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
Abstract
In this paper, we examine the linkage between woody plants and the water budget for three important woody plant communities in Texas, USA: saltcedar (Tamarix chinensis, Tamarix ramosissima), Ashe juniper (Juniperus ashei Buchholz), and mesquite (Prosopis glandulosa Torr. var. glandulosa). In most cases, these species are found in distinct physiographic and soil settings. Saltcedar is restricted to stream channels and floodplains; Ashe juniper is found mostly on karst limestone outcrops with shallow soils; and mesquite is found on deep soils. Because of these differences, changes in woody plant cover in each community will have a different effect on the water budget. For each type, we review the available literature and explicitly report the scale of observation (tree, stand, catchment, or landscape). A simple framework called the shrubβstreamflow framework, which recognizes differences in response due to differences in physiographic setting, climate, and potential for deep drainage or subsurface flow, enables us to generalize the results. The fundamental premise of the framework is simple: for shrublands to be hydrologically sensitive to changes in woody plant cover, soil water or groundwater must be accessible to deepβrooting plants but too deep for shallowβrooting ones. Such a situation exists if groundwater is close to the surface (within 3β5 m and/or if deep drainage occurs (because of either high precipitation input or bypass flow in the soil). We argue that on an area basis, conversion of saltcedar stands to herbaceous plants in riparian regions has a much greater potential for increasing water yield than does conversion of woodlands to grasslands in upland regions where deep drainage does not occur. On upland sites where deep drainage does occur, conversion from woody to herbaceous vegetation may result in a savings of 40β80 mm year^β1^ of water. But such savings have been observed only up to the smallβcatchment scale, and until further work is done it is uncertain whether they can be achieved at larger scales. Copyright Β© 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Abstract Recent studies have reported that not only water travelling through the soil layer but also emerging from fractured/weathered bedrock, contributes to hillslope runoff from steep wet hillslopes. Therefore, discharge is derived from a variety of hillslope sources. However, data are often